Hybrid Cloud on Digi Hunch

Kubernetes Platform as a Service and Red Hat OpenShift

Sun, 25 Jun 2023 11:10:15 -0400

The Three-layer model

Kubernetes is so complex that it becomes a buzz word itself. I categorize the related work into three layers: a cluster layer, a platform layer and an application layer, by their purposes. The three layers are illustrated as below:

Let’s examine each layer in this model and where the Kubernetes Platform as a Service fits in.

The Kubernetes Cluster Layer

At the bottom, the Kubernetes Cluster layer is the foundational layer. It focus on using self-hosted VMs or cloud resources to build a functional Kubernetes cluster and worker node groups. A functional cluster includes a highly available control plane, as well as scalable node groups that all communicate with the control plane. Cloud Service Providers like AWS and Azure provides managed Kubernetes service, which takes away the complexity (and flexibility as well) of managing control plane components such as etcd store and API server. The managed services also automatically provisions computing nodes and join them into the cluster. The cluster layer may also involve integration with of CNI and CSI, to ensure Pod-to-Pod communication and available storage classes.

Professionals working at this layer are infrastructure experts who understand networking, storage, as well as how to manage cloud resources or VMs, infrastructure as code. On a daily basis, they deal with VPCs/V-Nets, subnets, EBS/Azure Disk, File storage, EC2/Azure VMs, etc. When the team is doing a bad job at this layer, you might see symptoms like unresponsive cluster API, orphaned worker nodes, or kubectl failing to connect to cluster endpoint.

The tenants (applications) of the Kubernetes platform does not directly interact with this layer. If you decide to switch CSP vendor, this layer requires 100% re-engineering because the managed Kubernetes service by each CSP is different.

The Kubernetes Platform Layer

The Platform layer sits in the middle. When organization decides to adopt Kubernetes, they often underestimate the efforts required in this layer. This layer works on a functional cluster, without directly interacting with the underlying cloud resources. This layer involves any Kubernetes abstractions that do not creates tangible business value. Rather, this layer is an enabler. It allows the applications to deploy smoothly, evolve quickly, and more importantly, focus on the business.

Teams working on this layer needs to be Kubernetes experts. On a daily basis, they play with common CNCF toolings, such as Prometheus, ArgoCD, Istio, Cilium, Tekton, Open Policy Agent, etc. They are comfortable with Operators, Helm Charts, Ingress, etc. Inside of the Kubernetes cluster, they also manage the foundational services such as Event streaming (e.g. Kafka), PostgreSQL database (e.g. PostgreSQL), software-defined storage (e.g. Ceph), service mesh (e.g. Istio), Authentication (e.g. Keykloak) , etc. These services act as the infrastructure layer to the business workload. If the team is doing a bad job, you would see data loss with database, observability service not populating data, ingress does not process request, etc.

The tenants (application) share services in this layer. If you decide to switch CSP vendor. I estimate 80% of the work at this layer is portable, and 20% requires re-engineering. That is because each CSP offers different external resources, therefor the low level Kubernetes objects in this layer, such as storage classes, load balancers, supported CNIs are different. High level objects such as Kafka remains portable across platforms.

The Application Layer

The next layer at the top is application layer. Workloads in this layer are directly linked to the business value. The applications are very diverse. Most of the time, the release team is the main player at this layer. If the organization develops its own application, the software development team also work at this layer.

In terms of knowledge, the members of development team are experts in software engineering, and Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), etc. On a daily basis, they deal with programming languages, product development, build and release. If they screw up their work, expect business errors, such as orders sent to wrong client, incorrect balance sheet, etc. This team has high visibility in the organization due to its direct link to business value.

This layer of work involves multiple tenants. Each tenant is isolated within their own namespace. When you switch CSP vendor, this layer should be readily portable with minimal effort.

It is also worth noting that, with solid platform and cluster layers, the team working at this layer do not write bespoke code for networking, observability, authentication and authorization, encryption and many other aspects not relevant to the core business. Once deployed, the application services are resilient, scale to demands, and cost efficient. This layer reaps the benefits of Kubernetes.

Kubernetes Platform as a Service

As the Kubernetes dust is still settling, a builder’s title may not always reflect which layer she or he focuses on. Today it is pretty common for infrastructure engineers to expand their role into the platform layer, or likewise, a software engineer to drill down to the platform layer.

The boundary between platform layer and cluster layer is clear. The cluster layer deals with underlying infrastructure, either in the cloud or on premise. They abstract away the complex infrastructure world from those working with the platform layer.

The boundary between platform layer and application layer is a little tricky to articulate. The application layer focuses on implementing the business logics. The platform layer takes care of the functions that are not part of business logic but essential to the business application. Take an HTTP request for example, application developer should not have to write code to terminate TLS (not part of business logic). They should only write the code to process the HTTP request (business logic). TLS termination is delegated to an Ingress, to be configured by platform builders.

The folks working at the Platform layer needs to interface with both sides. They provide Platform as a Service to the Application teams. However, their work appears mostly invisible in an organization. Their effort is oftentimes underestimated. There are several reasons for that. First, the platform layer does not directly create tangible business value. They are just someone else’s enabler. Second, their building blocks involve a lot of abstractions by Kubernetes API. Third, the idea of platform engineering is newly emerged. There hasn’t been a populous recognition of its value.

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

The platform team builds the platform with their choice of open-source tools. For clusters using OpenShift Kubernetes Engine, Red Hat introduces Open Shift container platform consisting of Red Hat’s opinionated (but validated) choice of toolings, for example:

OpenShift Service Mesh: Istio
OpenShift Streams: Apache Kafka
OpenShift GitOps: ArgoCD
OpenShift Container Platform Pipelines: Tekton
OpenShift Serverless: Knative
OpenShift Data Foundation: Ceph

Clients building their clusters with OpenShift Kubernetes Engine may build their own platform with the toolings in the OpenShift enterprise Kubernetes container platform. For more services, check out the documentation for OpenShift Container Platform. For customers with OpenShift Kubernetes Engine, their options to DIY platform are:

Entry-Level: Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine: Enterprise Kubernetes distribution on RHEL CoreOS
Mid-Level: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform (RHOCP):
Plus-Level: Red Hat OpenShift Platform Plus: RHOCP + advanced cluster management, security, data management essentials, enterprise container registry

OpenShift runs the business model of Kubernetes PaaS.This is a unique business model that I do not find a matching competitor. Even if you choose to DIY your own platform, the Red Hat’s choices are still a great reference. The OpenShift enterprise Kubernetes container platform maps perfectly to the platform layer of the three-layer model, aiming to simplify the work in the platform layer.

Managed RedHat OpenShift

At first, the OpenShift container platform started as a value add-on to the Kubernetes Engine. Now it’s a separate product line in their business model. In the mean time, OpenShift partners with major CSPs, to develop the cloud service editions, including:

Red Hat OpenShift on AWS (ROSA)
Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift (ARO)
Red Hat OpenShift Dedicated – on AWS and GCP
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

These offerings are managed Kubernetes Platform as a Service in the cloud. Since RedHat is the only player in this model, we can refer to them as managed OpenShift services. In addition to an already-confusing world of Kubernetes platform portfolios, these offerings gives consumers even more options. On AWS for example, users have the following options:

Managed Platform: OpenShift Dedicated, managed by Red Hat
Managed Platform: Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS (ROSA), managed by Red Hat and AWS
Self-built cluster: OpenShift Container Platform

This video discussed more details about these options, such as support model. It is also worth noting that these options tend to be much pricier than managed clusters such as EKS and AKS.

Since a Managed RedHat Platform makes it easy to deploy, let’s take ROSA as an example and create a cluster. To enable ROSA in AWS console, click on “Getting Started”. The next page ensures ROSA is enabled and checks other prerequisite such as meeting service quotas and creating ELB service-linked role, as show below:

Now, with an AWS account (and ROSA enabled), a RedHat account, and the rosa-cli utility, we can create a cluster with just a few commands. As a note, be wary of the cost and do not forget to delete the cluster afterwards.

Create a ROSA cluster

With the following set of commands, we can kick off cluster creation, using STS. We can bring our own VPC, so long as it meets certain prerequisites. I use the Terraform template in the vpc-base project, to create the underlying VPC. We’ll need the followings from this template:

The CIDR range of the VPC: as input with a default
The subnet Ids of the private subnet to place, printed in the output

The subnets are private subnets, because we want to provision the cluster with private node and private endpoint. When we use rosa CLI, we provide the CIDR and subnet IDs.

# start with AWS cli configured to the correct profile
rosa login # with redhat account and past token
rosa create account-roles --mode auto -y # this command creates the IAM roles ManagedOpenShift-*-Role, with RedHat account as trust entity
rosa verify permissions # optional
rosa verify quota # optional

export ROSA_CLUSTER_NAME="dhc" \
OPENSHIFT_VERSION=4.13.4 \
AWS_ACCOUNT_ID=$(aws sts get-caller-identity --query Account --output text) \
AWS_DEFAULT_REGION=us-east-1

rosa create cluster --sts --private \
 --cluster-name $ROSA_CLUSTER_NAME \
 --multi-az \
 --private-link \
 --region $AWS_DEFAULT_REGION \
 --version $OPENSHIFT_VERSION \
 --enable-autoscaling \
 --min-replicas 3 \
 --max-replicas 3 \
 --compute-machine-type m5.xlarge \
 --machine-cidr 147.206.0.0/16 \
 --subnet-ids subnet-052852a1fb4d7d2ad,subnet-06d8d40ae39d55c47,subnet-0f67ce08bc588012c

The CLI will pick up the correct VPC by CIDR, and prompt you to confirm creation of private cluster. After the command kicks off, it will wait for OIDC provider creation, and role creation. Then it uses a Terraform template to create the related resources including VPC. Use this command to check status:

rosa list clusters
rosa describe cluster -c dhc

When the second command displays the state of waiting (Waiting for OIDC configuration), we can create OIDC provider:

rosa create operator-roles -c $ROSA_CLUSTER_NAME --mode auto --yes
rosa create oidc-provider -c $ROSA_CLUSTER_NAME --mode auto --yes

Throughout the process, we can monitor the install log (terraform output) with:

rosa logs install -c dhc --watch

In the log, you might see errors with terminals connecting to the terraform backend, which doesn’t necessarily indicate a cluster creation error. Always check the cluster state until it reports success.

Kick the tires

Eventually the describe cluster command will show ready state. We can now create an admin user:

rosa create admin -c $ROSA_CLUSTER_NAME

The command above prints an oc command (OpenShift CLI, equivalent to kubectl) with password to log in. Let’s examine the cluster with oc. Because it is a private cluster, the endpoint is not available publicly. However, it is accessible from the Bastion host. Use the SSM Session Manager technique from my previous post to SSH to the Bastion Host, which should have oc installed. To install oc yourself, use HomeBrew on Mac. On Linux or Windows, log on to OpenShift console, go to Downloads on the left pannel and find it out under CLI tools.

The oc command may report insecure TLS on the login URL. Wait for a few minutes for the certificate to come off as safe. Once you run the oc command with password, it should return “Login successful” and then we can connect to the cluster:

$ oc get node # or kubectl get node
NAME STATUS ROLES AGE VERSION
ip-147-206-135-41.ec2.internal Ready,SchedulingDisabled infra,worker 3m5s v1.26.5+7d22122
ip-147-206-155-141.ec2.internal Ready control-plane,master 25m v1.26.5+7d22122
ip-147-206-156-81.ec2.internal Ready worker 19m v1.26.5+7d22122
ip-147-206-164-21.ec2.internal Ready infra,worker 3m3s v1.26.5+7d22122
ip-147-206-179-90.ec2.internal Ready worker 19m v1.26.5+7d22122
ip-147-206-191-118.ec2.internal Ready,SchedulingDisabled control-plane,master 26m v1.26.5+7d22122
ip-147-206-192-232.ec2.internal Ready worker 19m v1.26.5+7d22122
ip-147-206-193-198.ec2.internal Ready infra,worker 3m20s v1.26.5+7d22122
ip-147-206-218-114.ec2.internal Ready control-plane,master 26m v1.26.5+7d22122

You can use oc the same way you’d use kubectl. Both works through SOCK5 proxy. In the meantime, log in to the RedHat console with your Red Hat credential, you can see the cluster in Ready state as well:

The rosa create admin command creates a htpasswd type (username-password) of identity provider (IdP) with a user named cluster-admin and a preset password. In real life however, we often configure third party IdP with OIDC integration. I’ll have to leave this to the next blog post.

We shall see the nodes as EC2 instances from AWS console as well. Note that there are three roles: control-plane, worker and infra. The infra nodes are for infrastructure services. These services (Ingress Controller, GitOps, Pipeliens) are the ones in the platform player as we discussed above.

There are many customizations you can make in this installation process and I’d have to defer to the ROSA documentation. To clean up, use the following ROSA command:

rosa remove cluster -c dhc

The output also gives you the command to delete operator roles and OIDC provider, for example:

rosa delete operator-roles -c 23o4u3j98tqmlbtjo612opb7a4bbim5f --mode auto --yes
rosa delete oidc-provider -c 23o4u3j98tqmlbtjo612opb7a4bbim5f --mode auto --yes

Then we can destroy the VPCs using terraform.

ROSA with HCP

Update Oct 2023:

The deployment above provisioned a few nodes for control plane, which add to the overall time to provision a cluster. In Aug 2023, there is a new option Hosted Control Plane (HCP) that came to allow users to provision a hosted control plane. This results in cost savings and shorter time to provision a cluster. Here is a table of comparison between the ROSA with HCP and ROSA classic.

Final words

In this post, I discussed the three-layer model and pointed out that platform layer isn’t as visible as the other two. I also experimented ROSA as a turn-key Kubernetes platform with its opinionated stack of services.

Some misinformed organizations even skip the entire platform layer in their estimate of effort. They build a cluster, ran a hello-world service and assumes they can start putting applications on the Kubernetes cluster. There are also customers who purchased the entire Managed OpenShift platform but only use it as a cluster. Yikes!

The concept of Kubernetes platform, or generally platform engineering is still spreading. The consulting team that I worked in full-time last year re-branded itself as platform engineering. Marketings are pushing it. Builders are doing it. We’ll keep an eye, on whether customers are buying it.

MinIO for S3-compatible Object Storage

Fri, 09 Sep 2022 09:00:00 -0400

I reviewed some storage technologies on Kubernetes but they are all for block and file storage. In this post, I will discuss the current available options for container workload to use object storage. I will also touch on MinIO as an object storage solution.

Object storage

Block and file system are more native to operating system because they present themselves to the OS as a block device or file system attached to the OS. In other words, application processes running on the OS will be able to access the storage by address expressed as a POSIX-compatible path. On the contrary, object storage is a REST API service, operating at the application layer in the TCP/IP stack. Therefore, we can think of object storage as “storage as a web service”.

Object storage can be made very cheap. However, the application protocol may vary depending on the object storage provider. Amazon S3 is a forerunner in object storage market and its protocol has emerged as the de-facto standard for object storage. When building an application and if there is one object storage protocol to support, it should be S3. For non-S3 object storage services, we can front them with an S3 interface, if the provider itself does not have one. For example Ceph storage has its Gateway S3 API.

Container Object Storage Interface

If we use S3 as the universal object storage protocol, does that also address object storage access with container workload on Kubernetes? Absolutely. Nonetheless, for a number of reasons using REST API from containers are not the best option. From platform’s perspective, it is the platform that should define how to access object storage, instead of leaving it with an application-layer protocol.

When a pattern (for storage, or networking, etc) turns out very common, the platform layer should incorporate it as an infrastructure service, manage it with its own standard, and provide it to application so that developer can focus on business features. With that vision, the community brought up the Container Object Storage Interface (COSI) initiative. It is currently in very early stage, but the idea is to commoditize object storage in Kubernetes platform with a unified interface. For more background about this initiative, refer to the post “Beyond block and file – COSI enables object storage in Kubernetes“.

COSI is the ultimate cloud native solution but it is still in pre-alpha phase as of mid 2022. Unfortunately, it is not a recommended solution to any real-life project in 2022, and we are stuck with the unified API approach until COSI matures.. The unified API approach is by no means cloud native, but has come to maturity for adoption. S3 Rest API is our friend, regardless of whether the client process is in a container or not.

Update: on Sept 2, 2022, Kubernetes introduced COSI as alpha feature.

MinIO Introduction

In order to use S3 protocol without using Amazon S3 storage, we can use MinIO to build our own object storage service serve client via a S3-compatible REST API interface. The main developer of the MinIO project is MinIO Inc, a startup from 2014. Having learned the lessons from GlusterFS, the founders and developers make MinIO very simple. MinIO operates in two modes: gateway mode (soon to be legacy) and server mode.

In the Gateway mode, MinIO as a gateway between client and destination storage, and does not persist data to itself. In the past, the destination storage can be Azure Blob and Google Cloud Storage (GCS) and HDFS as backend. However, these supports are deprecated now. The current release (July 2022) only supports S3 and NAS backend. According to MinIO’s blog post from February 2022, the entire MinIO Gateway feature will be removed in August, leaving server mode the only option for MinIO.

In the Server mode, the MinIO service will persist data to itself in a file system (or volume). You can specify that file system (or volume) as you launch the server. As one of the quick-start guides shows, we can host MinIO server using a single executable. For administrative tasks, MinIO has a web console and a client utility called mc.

MinIO Deployment Options

For storage service, there are a number of deployment options:

SNSD (single-node, single-drive): single MinIO server with a single storage volume or folder.
SNMD (signle-node, multi-drive): single MinIO server with four or more storage volumes.
MNMD (multi-node, multi-drive, aka distributed): multiple MinIO servers with at least four drives across all servers. This should be considered for production grade configuration.

The deployment options above describes the node and volume topology. No matter which topology option, there are also a number of ways to host the MinIO service process: on Linux OS, Windows OS, MacOS, Docker Container, and on Kubernetes platform.

In addition, MinIO Inc ships the software under different business models. For example, there are fully managed applications in Azure Marketplace, AWS Marketplace, and GCP Marketplace all hosted on virtual machines with extra charges. Clients not willing to pay can host MinIO storage all on their own, either on virtual machines, or on managed Kubernetes environment provided by each cloud provider.

MinIO Hosting solutions

MinIO lists these hosting solutions under multi-cloud products. These hosting solutions (or “products” in MinIO’s term) vary in terms of where peripheral services and data tiers are hosted. Here is the list of the supported platforms:

To illustrate how these solutions are different, I put some details on a few options together for an incomplete comparison below:

	Kubernetes	EKS	AKS	GKE
Hot Storage	Direct PV (NVMe)	EKS EBS CSI	Azure CSI	GKE Standard SSD
Warm Storage	Direct PV (HDD)	S3 IA	Azure BlobStore	GCS
Cold Storage	Public Cloud storage	Glacier	Azure Cool Blob	GCS for Data Archiving
Encryption	HashiCorp Vault	KMS	Azure Key Vault	Cloud Key Management
Observability	Elastic Stack and Grafana	Managed ElasticSearch Prometheus	Azure Monitor	Stack Driver
Identity Provider	KeyCloak	LDAP, SSO	Azure Active Directory	GCP Cloud Identity
LB and Cert Mgmt	Nginx, Let’s Entrypt	AWS Cert Mgr, ELB	Azure Load Balancer, JetStack, Let’s Encrypt	GCP Cloud LB and Managed Cert

Note that all of these hosting solutions are based on some flavour of Kubernetes. The hot tier is usually based on storage options available to the platform. MinIO service access this hot tier via Kubernetes persistent volume. The warm and cold tiers are backed by different object storage service. Between MinIO and storage client, it always use the same S3 compatible Rest API.

MinIO also has tiering capability. While the hot storage destination has to be either a file system or Kubernetes persistent volume, remote tiers can be S3 , Azure Blob, or GCS. MinIO supports encryption at rest (SSE-KMS, SSE-S3, SSE-C) and in transit (TLS) for security, as well as many other useful features such as object replication, versioning, locking, events, Prometheus metrics, lifecycle management etc.

Connect to MinIO server with S3 client

To validate that the client is compatible, we use MinIO’s client utility (mc) to connect to an AWS S3 bucket. Then we use AWS CLI to connect to a MinIO server, similar to this instruction. To do so, we first install client and server utilities:

brew install minio/stable/minio
brew install minio/stable/mc
minio --version
mc --version

Then, we start MinIO server and store an object using AWS CLI’s S3 tool. In our working directory, we create a new directory called minio_data and launch MinIO server with it:

mkdir minio_data
minio server minio_data --console-address :9090

Once the server is up, the screen should display the details, including the portal URL and the default username and password will be used as Access Key ID and Secret Key:

Note that the MinIO service does NOT have TLS enabled by default, on the console or API service. At this point, we can browse to the console web page using the given credential. Then, we can configure AWS CLI with a new profile just to act as a client to communicate with the MinIO server:

$ aws configure --profile minio-cli
AWS Access Key ID [None]: minioadmin
AWS Secret Access Key [None]: minioadmin
Default region name [None]: us-east-1
Default output format [None]: json
$ aws configure set default.s3.signature_version s3v4 --profile minio-cli

At this point, the AWS CLI is configured to communicate with MinIO server. Then, we can create bucket, list object in the bucket, copy an object to the bucket, etc

$ aws --endpoint-url http://127.0.0.1:9000 s3 ls --profile minio-cli # list all bucket, should return empty
$ aws --endpoint-url http://127.0.0.1:9000 s3 mb s3://hehebucket --profile minio-cli # create new bucket
make_bucket: hehebucket
$ aws --endpoint-url http://127.0.0.1:9000 s3 cp README.md s3://hehebucket --profile minio-cli # copy a file to bucket as a new object
upload: ./README.md to s3://hehebucket/README.md
$ aws --endpoint-url http://127.0.0.1:9000 s3 ls s3://hehebucket --profile minio-cli # list objects in the bucket
2022-07-09 00:30:23 631 README.md

The created bucket and object are also visible in MinIO web console, under “Bucket”:

The steps above validate that AWS CLI can talk to MinIO server. Because of that, MinIO server can emulate an S3 service in any development environment so users do not always have to use S3 from AWS. This makes sense for both cost and security reasons for the organization.

Connect to S3 with MinIO client

In this lab, we create an S3 bucket and use mc utility to store an object to it. In order to consistently create S3 bucket and associated permissions, I use the CloudFormation template in this repo. The output of the CloudFormation stack returns the Access Key ID and Secret Key required for the client to access the bucket. Once we cloned the repo, let’s enter the obj-store-helper directory, and run aws cli command to launch the CloudFormation template, assuming it has been configured:

BUCKET_NAME=c0sas2dsadigihunch
S3_STACK_NAME=$BUCKET_NAME-stack
aws cloudformation create-stack --template-body file://aws-s3-stack.yaml --stack-name $S3_STACK_NAME --parameters ParameterKey=S3BucketName,ParameterValue=$BUCKET_NAME --capabilities CAPABILITY_IAM

# to delete stack after test, run: aws cloudformation delete-stack --stack-name $S3_STACK_NAME

In the AWS console, we should see the configuration information as below:

Supposed the bucket name is vna-tst-c0sas2dsadigihunch as shown above, this allows us to configure the client utility MC as below:

mc alias set awss3 https://s3.amazonaws.com # Fill in access key ID and Secret key at the prompt
mc ls awss3/vna-tst-c0sas2dsadigihunch # list objects in the bucket, should return empty
mc cp README.md awss3/vna-tst-c0sas2dsadigihunch/README.md # upload and object to bucket
mc ls awss3/vna-tst-c0sas2dsadigihunch # list objects in the bucket, the uploaded object should be there
mc rm awss3/vna-tst-c0sas2dsadigihunch/README.md # delete the object
mc alias remove awss3 # remove awss3 alias

Once we emptied the bucket, we can delete the CloudFormation stack. This test only needs client utility mc to verify that MinIO client is able to talk to AWS S3 server.

Erasure Coding

For scalable production use, we should deploy MinIO in distributed mode. When MinIO is configured in distributed deployment (MNMD, or multi-node, multi-drive), it implicitly enables an important feature called erasure coding. This erasure coding feature further unlocks a number of other MinIO features:

Erasure coding is MinIO’s data redundancy and availability feature that allows MinIO deployments to automatically reconstruct objects on-the-fly despite the loss of multiple drives or nodes in the cluster. Erasure coding provides object-level handling with less overhead than adjacent technologies such as RAID. The key concept is Erasure Set, a set of drives in a MinIO deployment that supports Erasure Coding. MinIO evenly distributes object data and parity blocks among the drives in the Erasure Set.

Two important variables are M and N: for a given erasure set of size M, MinIO splits objects into N parity blocks, and M-N data blocks. MinIO uses the EC:N notation to refer to the number of parity blocks (N) in the deployment. To determine optimal erasure set size for the cluster, use MinIO’s Erasure Coding Calculator tool.

To help client to specify per-object parity with Erasure Coding, MinIO uses storage classes. Note that the storage class concept in MinIO is distinct from AWS S3 storage class or Kubernetes storage class. In MinIO, a storage class defines parity settings per object. The STANDARD storage class (default) defines EC:N based on M, which can be overridden. In addition, there is REDUCED_REDUNDANCY storage class, whose parity must be less than or equal to that of STANDARD storage class.

The erasure coded backend also protects the storage against Bit Rot with HighwayHash algorithm.

More Features

Authentication and authorization between MinIO client and MinIO server have a number of options. MinIO client may use the built-in standalone identity management in MinIO server. This is the default mode. In addition, one may delegate IAM to external service. To Active Directory via LDAP, or any Identity provider that supports OIDC (JWT with Authorization Code Flow).

As to Object Lifecycle Management (OLM), MinIO allows you to define a remote tier storage for each local target (bucket). The remote tier can be Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage or Azure Blob storage. We can use mc utility to administer the remote tier and OLM. Configuration steps (e.g. Azure Blob, AWS S3) usually include:

Configure required permissions on the MinIO bucket, create user account for OLM activities.
Configure the Remote Storage Tier
Create and Apply an ILM Transition Rule. The rule can be expressed in a json document.
Validate the creation of ILM transition rule
Validate the effect of transition rule.

As for encryption, MinIO can support encryption at rest. It can also work with etcd store to store encrypted IAM assets if KMS is configured.

Conclusion

Even though we watch for the progress of COSI initiative, we still use Rest API to access object storage from container, which is no different than from a virtual machine. If we develop an application, then we should make it support S3 protocol, a de-facto standard protocol for object storage. As for the storage backend, if we want to be vendor neutral, the feature-rich MinIO is the best bet. We can use MinIO to build our own Object storage as a service compatible with S3. We can also lifecycle our object to remote object storage tier backed by Azure, GCP or S3. In this post we validated the S3 compatibility, and discussed some advanced MinIO features.

Kubernetes Storage on Azure 2 of 3 – Portworx

Fri, 12 Aug 2022 15:23:00 -0400

In the previous post, we have discussed built-in storage classes on Azure Kubernetes. Further to that, we will examine some third-party software defined storage (SDS) options that are compatible with Azure Kubernetes Service in this post. Then we take Portworx on Azure as an example. Although, these options are specific to Azure, most of the players also have solutions for other managed Kubernetes platforms. Also, the methodology to study storage options remain the same regardless of cloud service provider.

In fact, I touched on software defined storage (SDS) in the context of general non-containerized workload in a separate post. In short, storage providers decouple the SDS appliance from the full storage solution in order to lower the cost and increase flexibility. To the storage consumer (e.g. a process running on Linux OS), SDS can present a block disk or file system. There are also SDS solution that can host your own object storage and we will discuss that later. In fact, SDS has gained significant popularity in recent years. For example, the report “Validating Software-Defined Storage Operating Models for the Enterprise” by archiectingit divided the evolution into four phases and cited that Gartner predicts the SDS revolution to reach 50% of the storage market by 2024, from 15% in 2020.

This post discusses SDS in the context of container storage. Then we will install Portworx on Azure Kubernetes.

SDS for Kubernetes

Many SDS appliances also developed the capability to present storage volumes to containerized workload. I put together a list of SDS products that works on Azure with their supported access modes:

Solution	Licence	Development and Support	Access Mode
Portworx	Closed source. Free Essential tier. Enterprise features on License.	Commercially supported by PureStorage	RWO, RWX
Ceph by Rook	Open source. Rook is a graduated CNCF project.	Developed and commercially supported by Red Hat, Canonical and SoftIron	RWO, ROX, RWX
OpenEBS	Open source. Sandbox CNCF project.	Developed and commercially supported by MayaData et al.	RWO
Longhorn	Open source. Incubating CNCF project.	Originally developed by Rancher, and commercially supported by SUSE	RWO
StorageOS	Closed source. License required.	Commercial support by Ondat.	RWO
LINBIT	Open-source with enterprise plans	Enterprise support

RWO is the most commonly supported mode. The report “Performance Benchmarking Cloud Native Storage Solutions for Kubernetes” makes a comparison of performance among some of the options in early 2021. Another potentially opinionated comparison list is by LINBIT.

Portworx is a leading player with commercial SDS solution and I will test its free Essential tier in the rest of this post. Ceph is one of the most mature leading open-source offering and I will test it in the next post.

For Portworx, we can use the terraform template cloudkube for Azure. The template assigns the kubelet’s managed identity as contributor of the node resource group. The template also creates a bastion host with direct SSH access to the nodes.

Portworx Operator on Azure

We use Portworx Operator to configure storage cluster. Portworx has an instruction for AKS but it is not tailored to specific identity model. For simplicity, use my cloudkube Terraform template to create the AKS cluster, and skip the “Prepare Your AKS Platform” page. Instead, follow the “Deploy Portworx using Azure managed identity on new AKS cluster” page starting at step 7.

At that step, we need to create a secret with the client ID of the managed identity for node agent. The terraform template outputs the BYO identity’s client ID. After cluster creation, we simply SSH to the bastion host and create the secret using the output.

To install Porworx using operator, we can follow a wizard in PX-central. If this is the first time, we need to create an account and log in to the portal. If this is not the first time and you have previously created a cluster, you need to detach that cluster by going to Profile from bottom left corner on the portal page.

Follow the guide in “Install Portworx on AKS using the Operator“. In the wizard, click on “Portworx Essentials” for free tier, or “Portworx Enterprise” for the 30-day trial. Then select operator with latest version. In the rest of the wizard steps, select options applicable to Azure environment. The last step will present two kubectl commands to install operator and install the CR. Run the command to install operator and verify result:

kubectl apply -f 'https://install.portworx.com/2.9?comp=pxoperator'
kubectl -n kube-system get deployment portworx-operator

Portworx Custom Resource

To install the CR, we need to customize the given manifest in order to use our managed identity. We can download the YAML manifest (portworx_essentials.yml) and modify it in text editor. As the page “Deploy Portworx using Azure managed identity on new AKS cluster” suggest at step 9: in the env section, remove the AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET and AZURE_TENANT_ID sections but keep the AZURE_CLIENT_ID section. My CRD declaration looks like this:

# SOURCE: https://install.portworx.com/?operator=true&mc=false&kbver=&oem=esse&user=myuserid&b=true&kd=type%3DPremium_LRS%2Csize%3D150&s=%22type%3DPremium_LRS%2Csize%3D150%22&c=my-very-long-px-cluster-id&aks=true&stork=true&csi=true&mon=true&tel=false&st=k8s&promop=true
kind: StorageCluster
apiVersion: core.libopenstorage.org/v1
metadata:
 name: my-very-long-px-cluster-id
 namespace: kube-system
 annotations:
 portworx.io/install-source: "https://install.portworx.com/?operator=true&mc=false&kbver=&oem=esse&user=myuserid&b=true&kd=type%3DPremium_LRS%2Csize%3D150&s=%22type%3DPremium_LRS%2Csize%3D150%22&c=my-very-long-px-cluster-id&aks=true&stork=true&csi=true&mon=true&tel=false&st=k8s&promop=true"
 portworx.io/is-aks: "true"
 portworx.io/misc-args: "--oem esse"
spec:
 image: portworx/oci-monitor:2.10.2
 imagePullPolicy: Always
 kvdb:
 internal: true
 cloudStorage:
 deviceSpecs:
 - type=Premium_LRS,size=150
 kvdbDeviceSpec: type=Premium_LRS,size=150
 secretsProvider: k8s
 stork:
 enabled: true
 args:
 webhook-controller: "true"
 autopilot:
 enabled: true
 monitoring:
 prometheus:
 enabled: true
 exportMetrics: true
 featureGates:
 CSI: "true"
 env:
 - name: AZURE_CLIENT_ID
 valueFrom:
 secretKeyRef:
 name: px-azure
 key: AZURE_CLIENT_ID
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
 name: px-essential
 namespace: kube-system
data:
 px-essen-user-id: aaaabbbbccccddddmyverylongpxessenuserid
 px-osb-endpoint: ssssssyyyyyyyzzzzzzmyverylongpxosbendpoint

In this custom resource manifest, I specify to get the cluster to create disk from Azure, even though it has the capability of using an existing disk. Then apply the CRD manifest:

 kubectl apply -f portworx_essentials.yml

This will take up to 10 minutes to create several related resources. There are several check points to ensure the cluster is created successfully. Here are some useful commands:

kubectl -n kube-system get po # all Pods related to portworx should be ready and running, especially the portworx-api ones
kubectl -n kube-system get storagecluster # the status should report online
PX_POD=$(kubectl get pods -l name=portworx -n kube-system -o jsonpath='{.items[0].metadata.name}') 
# get the name of one of the portworx Pod for storage cluster
kubectl -n kube-system exec -c portworx -it $PX_POD --tty --stdin -- /opt/pwx/bin/pxctl status 
# should report "Status: PX is operational" with valid license loaded
kubectl get sc # portworx related storage classes are available

The pre-built storage classes are not CSI based. However, CSI should be automatically enabled in recent operator versions. We should create our own CSI storage classes and PVCs using our own storage classes. Here are two examples:

kind: StorageClass
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
 name: px-csi-database
provisioner: pxd.portworx.com
parameters:
 repl: "2"
 priority_io: "high"
 io_profile: "db"
---
kind: StorageClass
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
 name: px-csi-artifact
provisioner: pxd.portworx.com
parameters:
 repl: "2"
 priority_io: "medium"
 io_profile: "sequential"

That is a bare minimum Portworx installation. Check out their documentation for the full features. With this minimum install we can go to the section “Validate Persistent Storage” from the previous post to validate the persistent volume.

For troubleshooting purpose, pxctl is the utility and it is available on Portworx Pods.

Performance

We care not only the functionality, but also the performance. So I ran a quick performance test using kube-str, using all default configuration. The result is as follows:

	read_iops	write_iops	read_bw	write_bw
px-csi-database	IOPS=969.614136 BW(KiB/s)=3894	IOPS=729.698059 BW(KiB/s)=2935	IOPS=1172.772827 BW(KiB/s)=150639	IOPS=691.626526 BW(KiB/s)=89053
px-csi-artifact	IOPS=780.681946 BW(KiB/s)=3139	IOPS=682.522766 BW(KiB/s)=2746	IOPS=773.548584 BW(KiB/s)=99549	IOPS=659.015320 BW(KiB/s)=84890

Note that those numbers reflect performance under default configuration, and they should not be considered as the best performance that Portworx can deliver on Azure Kubernetes. Before moving to production, it is important to establish your own test parameters that best represents the container workload, and then iterate through different parameters for the storage class based on the requirement and performance output.

FSx ONTAP – Enterprise storage on AWS

Sat, 14 May 2022 22:28:00 -0400

Even though object storage has gained a lot of popularity, file storage is still prevalent. AWS has Elastic File System but the performance is insufficient for enterprise workload. The FSx product line has enterprise storage options and on Sept 2, 2021, AWS launched FSx ONTAP.

This post is my impression about FSx ONTAP. As previously discussed, FSx ONTAP is a managed NetApp storage service by AWS. Essentially, AWS installs NetApp arrays in their data centres, so that users can provision ONTAP volumes from AWS console, or using AWS CLI.

FSx ONTAP

ONTAP (or Data OONTAP) has been a very successful operating system to manage storage arrays. It was so successful that NetApp uses ONTAP as brandname for their storage arrays. This is similar to Isilon, a name of BSD based operating system to manage storage and later becomes brandname of EMC’s storage products. ONTAP has been in competition with other enterprise storage players such as EMC Isilon, HP 3PAR, etc and AWS landed on ONTAP as their partner for enterprise storage. It appears that NetApp still owns their ONTAP storage technology. AWS operates the data centre and provides capability via the CLI layer and console.

Sometimes, people confuses FSx ONTAP with NetApps offering Cloud volumes ONTAP. The two are fundamentally different. Cloud volumes ONTAP works with Cloud Manager (available as self-hosted or SaaS) as the management UI. It manages volumes provisioned from cloud vendor such as AWS, Azure, etc. Clients often configure these “Cloud volumes” as extension to an existing on-premise ONTAP storage deployment. When their on-prem ONTAP volumes fall short of space, the Cloud Manage is aware of a remotely available, cloud backed volume to move cold data off to.

Client Tool

FSx ONTAP is essentially an ONTAP storage cluster sitting in AWS data centre. Users have the options of using AWS CLI or ONTAP CLI to manage the cluster. Users with storage administrator background are likely to prefer the latter. In my professional service experience, I have taken some iterations to come to best practice to use the right tool to interact with ONTAP resources. In a nut shell, it depends on the level of resource that we are interacting with. I categorize those resources into two classes:

Category	Example	Identification
AWS-level resource	FSx ONTAP file system, Storage Virtual Machine	These resources are from ONTAP but they are identified as AWS resources (with ARN). They are also exposed to AWS SDK and can be managed by AWS CLI.
ONTAP-native resource	Volume, Snapshot policy, Schedule, Snapmirror relationship, Vserver	These resources come from ONTAP and can only be managed using ONTAP CLI. The AWS CLI cannot manage _these resources simply because they are not exposed to AWS SDK. Some type of resource such as Volume, may be managed by AWS CLI with very limited options. So we still prefer ONTAP CLI to manage resources.

The AWS CLI (v 2.2.37) has very limited options when creating volumes. For example, the create-volume documentation states that the OntapVolumeType section of output can display types of RW, DP (data protection), or LS. However, it doesn’t allow users to create a volume other than the default RW type. When we configure SnapMirror destination, we need a volume of DP type. We had to use ONTAP CLI to achieve that.

Our practice works out to be: use AWS CLI to create a file system and storage virtual machine. Then we use ONTAP CLI to create everything else. Even though AWS CLI intend to support volume creation, we prefer ONTAP CLI for full functionality support, and alignment with the ONTAP literature.

Administration Tasks

You should configure most of the administrative tasks with ONTAP CLI. We use the documentation by ONTAP as reference. For example, when a volume runs out of Inode, the AWS CLI reports that there is no space left. We need to increase the inode limit and this is, again, not something that AWS CLI can manage. We’d have to use the volume modify command from ONTAP CLI.

NFS version

The AWS document states that FSx ONTAP supports NFSv3.0, v4.0 and v4.1. However, FSx ONTAP is currently backed by NetApp ONTAP 9.10.0, which partially supports NFSv4.2, with basic protocol and Labled NFS feature. NetApp’s ONTAP Best Practices and Implementation Guide suggests a method for clients to mount as NFSv4.2. In the POC we mount as NFS v4.2 in all of our testings.

Clarity of terminology

The ONTAP storage system has been around for a while and many of its concepts are well known in the storage community. For example, A “Snapshot copy” is a read-only, point-in-time image of a volume. (ref: ONTAP 9 documentation -> ONTAP concepts -> Replication -> Snapshot copies) This concept becomes “Snapshot” in AWS literature. It took us some research to come to realize that “Snapshot” in AWS document, essentially maps to “Snapshot copy” in ONTAP literature.

This creates confusion, because we use ONTAP documentation for operation guidance because we can’t get enough help from AWS documentation. The terminology in AWS documentation should align with ONTAP.

The other example is the difference between “backup” and “snapshot” in AWS documentation. It is my understanding that they both use the same underlying Snapshot technology on the ONTAP side. I’m not exactly sure what their difference is.

ONTAP can create a Snapshot copy nearly instantaneously. However, when taking a snapshot using web console in AWS, it takes up to 10 minutes to update the status. This is confusing because it creates a perception that it takes 10 minutes to complete snapshot.

Cross Region Replication

There is a document page on AWS about using SnapMirror at a very high level. It points to two documents: using NetApp Cloud Manager and ONTAP CLI.

The former is not a viable option as we started natively on FSx ONTAP and do not have NetApp Cloud Manager. As to the latter, we managed to configure cross-region replication with ONTAP CLI following the document and identified some gaps in the documentation. Specifically, it would be helpful if AWS documentation calls out that:

inter-cluster network connectivity is a prerequisite (e.g. via VPC peering, transit gateway)
Port 10000, 11104-11105 must be added to security group for inter cluster communication.
The ONTAP CLI command to validate connectivity between clusters (using the ping command from ONTAP CLI).

With AWS CLI alone it is not possible to configure cross-region replication.

Final words

As someone who lived with enterprise storage for more than a decade, I’m glad to see that cloud vendors brings enterprise storage into their data centre, acknowledging that consumer grade file storage are just insufficient for heavy storage use cases such as medical imaging. FSx ONTAP seems to be in early maturity level. However, since AWS exposes ONTAP CLI access to users, ONTAP professionals are able to leverage its full potential.