control plane on Digi Hunch

EKS impression

Fri, 23 Dec 2022 18:18:19 -0400

I’ve worked on a few AKS projects previously. Since I joined AWS I wanted to put aside some time to check out EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Service). Here in this post, I put down my first impression on EKS, and also share my Terraform template in cloudkube project to create an EKS cluster.

Similar to AKS, EKS exposes API endpoint and the control plane components are hidden from AWS users. When creating EKS cluster it does not create the underlying VPC and subnets. Therefore, you have create an existing VPC and at least two subnets ahead of time, and specify them during EKS creation. Bear in mind that there is a list of requirement for the VPC and subnets.

In the cluster, the CNI that EKS officially supports is Amazon VPC CNI plugin. It is available as an add-on. Similar to Azure CNI, each Pod gets its own IP address. In addition, EKS supports other compatible CNI plugins such as Calico, Cilium, Weave Net and Antrea.

Computing Nodes in EKS

There are three modes to address computing capacity: self-managed nodes, EKS managed node groups and AWS Fargate. The documentation has a comparison table.

With self-managed nodes, users create EC2 instances separately and then register them to the control plane. The instances must use the same IAM role and AMI. You can use Auto Scaling groups of Bottlerocket (AWS-sponsored purpose-built Linux distro for container host) nodes. The self-managed node option is mostly for AWS outpost customers who bring in their own computing capacity from data centre.

If you provision computing capacity from AWS, it makes sense to assign EKS managed node groups when creating EKS cluster. We can turn on Cluster Autoscaler, a Kubernetes construct to manage the auto scaling of node groups. Sometimes we want to have more than one node groups. For example, to build a multi-architecture cluster, we need one node group with amd64 nodes and the other with arm64 nodes (e.g. instances with Graviton processor). In general, arm-based CPU delivers better performance with less power consumption and the industry is slowly moving towards more arm-based CPU architecture.

Fargate is what I call managed computing service for EKS. With Fargate you do not need to tweak Cluster Autoscaler to self-manage computing capacity. The Fargate documentation has a long list of considerations. For example, Pods must match a Fargate profile (here‘s an example) at the time that they’re scheduled to run on Fargate. So we need to build Fargate profile and Pod labelling properly. Also, Fargate does not support DaemonSet. Another big consideration is that Fargate does not support non-VPC CNI. In my opinion these are pretty significant limitations. Many workloads (system-level or application-level) would need Daemonset (e.g. kube-proxy, some CNI or CSI drivers, Dynatrace monitoring).

The pro of Fargate is the serverless computing model. The construct of a Fargate profile isn’t complicated. You just specify subnets, namespace and labels. However, the downside is the long list of considerations. Some teams may consider these restrictions too much. The other overhead is the need to manage Fargate profile to ensure all Pods are scheduled somewhere.

To me, using Fargate alone impairs portability of workload. The good thing is that Fargate and Managed Node Group are not mutually exclusive on a cluster. In most cases, we can go partially serverless, and reap the benefits of both of them.

Node AutoScaling

For workloads that don’t have a matching Fargate profile, we have to figure out node autoscaling ourselves. I touched on Cluster Autoscaler in “Autoscaling on Kubernetes Platform“. CA works on AWS as well and is triggered upon a Pod coming to unschedulable status in Scheduler. There is some limitations though. For example, CA interacts with Autoscaling Group (instead of EC2 instances directly). When it determines it’s time to scale up, it bumps up the desired capacity by one at a time in the Autoscaling group. The configurations in Autoscaling group may also be at play and CA do not have direct control. For example, the “scaling cooldown“. The pool of nodes is homogenous as per the pre-configured launch template and CA has no control. If a Pod requires a different type of node (e.g. ARM64 CPU, spot instance, etc), then we’d first have to create a node group with the desired node type. Moreover, in the worst cases, one-at-a-time scale-up does not meet the increase of demand driven by Pod increases, causing nuances such as racing conditions.

Because the Cluster Autoscaler doesn’t really deal with the nodes themselves, this kind of integration is clunky and slow. Nearly half of Kubernetes customers on AWS report that configuring cluster auto scaling using the Kubernetes Cluster Autoscaler is challenging and restrictive, according to this blog post. As a result, AWS launched an open-source cluster autoscaler project, Karpenter. Karpenter first only supported EKS but now the support includes other CSPs. For EKS, Karpenter directly interact with different types of EC2 instances.

Karpenter makes node scaling work in a more cloud-native manner. In the presence of unschedulable Pods, Karpenter bypasses the Kubernetes scheduler and works directly with the Cloud provider, to launch the minimal compute resources needed to fit those Pods and immediately binds the Pods to the newly provisioned Nodes without waiting for scheduler. As Pods are removed or rescheduled to other nodes, Karpenter looks for opportunities to terminate under-utilized nodes. Karpender defines a CR called Provisioner to specify node provisioning configuration, such as instance size, zone, CPU architecture, etc. It is a manifest that describes a node group so the node scaler is aware of all the available node types. You can have multiple Provisioners for different needs, just like node groups. The Provisioner CR can also set TTL for empty Nodes, such that once a Node has no pods other than DaemonSet, Karpenter will terminate the Node on TTL expiry.

Karpenter’s idea is similar to the idea of AutoPilot cluster in GKE. The new EKS workshop has an section on how to set up CA and Karpenter in practice.

Identity Management for EKS

For IAM, we need to be concerned with three aspects. The management traffic to the cloud service, the management traffic for Kubernetes cluster and business traffic.

Traffic type	AWS	Azure
I. Cloud Service Endpoint (Management Traffic for Cloud Service)	AWS IAM identity	Azure RBAC
II. Kubernetes API (Management Traffic for K8s Cluster)	IAM mapping or OIDC	Azure RBAC (implementation of OIDC)
III. Business traffic	Up to Kubernetes Ingress	Up to Kubernetes Ingress

For business traffic (type III), it is all up to the Ingress. I’ve written another article on managing ingress traffic on Kubernetes platforms. We interact with cloud service endpoint (type II) with either AWS CLI or Terraform, to create any object, including resources needed for a cluster. This is generally how we work with cloud service, not specific to Kubernetes. Usually the IAM identity assumes another IAM role, which empowers it with a lot of permissions.

For access to Kubernetes API (type III), EKS supports OIDC and IAM mapping. AWS documentation refers to this as “Cluster Authentication“. There is one special scenario where your identity for type II access inherits your identity for type I access. As the document puts:

When you create an Amazon EKS cluster, the AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) entity user or role, such as a federated user that creates the cluster, is automatically granted system:masters permissions in the cluster’s role-based access control (RBAC) configuration in the Amazon EKS control plane. This IAM entity doesn’t appear in any visible configuration, so make sure to keep track of which IAM entity originally created the cluster.

This special scenario (I call it the “implicit master user“) allows us to perform critical activities on the cluster, such as creating IAM mapping, or OIDC configuration.

The above addressed how AWS resource access Kubernetes resource. On the other hand, to address how a Kubernetes resource access AWS resources, we need IRSA (IAM Roles for Service Account). We have a service account in Kubernetes and map it to an IAM role.

AppMesh

AppMesh is AWS’ Envoy based service-mesh offering supporting Kubernetes cluster, ECS service and even EC2 instance. AppMesh’s control plane is a managed AWS service, with a controller running on the Kubernetes cluster. To install AppMesh on the cluster:

On the EKS cluster, install AppMesh Controller using Helm
Associate the cluster with IAM OIDC provider
Create an IAM role for the appmesh-controller service account

After these steps, you can create a mesh using CloudFormation, Terraform, etc. The data plane (Envoy proxy) can run on Kubernetes (as sidecar). Traffic between control plane and data plane can go through private link (Interface VPC endpoint) for added security. Like Istio, AppMesh enables mTLS. For observability, you can export Envoy metrics with Prometheus. Coupled with XRay, AppMesh also supports distributed tracing.

AppMesh uses a different set of CRDs than Istio. Key CRDs are:

Mesh: represents an entire service mesh. At mesh level you can configure Egress filter (to allow or deny external traffic) and set IP version (v4 vs v6)
VirtualGateway: a CRD that represents an Ingress in to the Mesh. A virtual gateway allows resources that are outside of your mesh to communicate to resources that are inside of your mesh. A virtual gateway references Envoy proxy deployment by podSelector. It references GatewayRoutes by namespaceSelector, and optionally gatewayRouteSelector. You also specify listeners in the manifest to reference Envoy proxy Service (LoadBalancer Type).
GatewayRoute: A gateway route is attached to a virtual gateway and routes traffic to an existing virtual service. If a route matches a request, it can distribute traffic to a target virtual service. In the manifest, you specify a list of httpRoute, each with matching condition and action. In the action section you can specify virtualService as target.
VirtualService: an abstraction of a real service provided by a virtual node directly or indirectly by means of a virtual router. Dependent services call your virtual service by its virtualServiceName, and those requests are routed to the VirtualNode or VirtualRouter that is specified as the provider for the VirtualService.
VirtualRouter: Virtual routers handle traffic for virtual services. In a virtual router manifest, you can define Route to direct incoming requests to virtual nodes as target.
VirtualNode: A virtual node acts as a logical pointer to a particular task group (i.e. ECS service, Kubernetes deployment). It represent a Service in the AppMesh. In the manifest, you reference Pods by podSelector, specify listeners for any inbound traffic that your virtual node expects, and specify serviceDiscovery for your task group.

You can configure those Custom Resources using YAML manifests (and check the API reference a lot). Alternatively, you can configure them from AWS CLI or AWS console. The console will help you visualize what can be configured. For further details on how these CRs play together, there is a workshop for AppMesh.

EKS cluster using Terraform

Officially, there is an EKS blueprint project for provisioning EKS cluster in Terraform.

I also keep my own Terraform code in the AWS directory of cloudkube project. It works out to be a little more complex than my Terraform template to create Azure Kubernetes Cluster (Azure directory). Because I had to create Cognito resources with initial credential to allow users to connect to cluster without using the implicit master account.

Below is the diagram of the processes.

Create EKS cluster with Terraform module

The template configures kubectl access on a Bastion host, which assumed the same role that our IAM user uses to create the Kubernetes cluster. Therefore, the IAM role is the master identity.

Note that the IAM user (power-user) has very powerful permissions. Usually it is ideal to assign lots of permission to IAM Roles (temporary credential) instead of IAM user (long-term credential). So the role chaining would look like:

The IAM user that Terraform uses has no permission other than assuming a “PowerUser” role
The PowerUser role trusts the IAM user. It also has the permission to assume the “EKS-Manager” role
The EKS-Manager role trusts PowerUser’s role session.

However, the role chaining scenario above is not currently supported in Terraform.

I use a Bastion host because the cluster endpoint is on private subnet. The bastion host is on a public subnet. However, if we do not like public subnet and public IP, we can place the bastion host on a private subnet, and use SSM system manager agent with SSH tunnel plugin to have SSH access to private bastion host.

Summary

I first came across this article about EKS and its awfulness and then decided to check out EKS. I’m not sure all points are still valid but it’s generally real-life experiences. There are also many peripheral services, such as AMP (AWS Managed Prometheus), AMG (AWS Managed Grafana), ADOT (AWS Distro for Open Telemetry), AppMesh (Another Envoy-based Service Mesh, easier to manage than Istio but less Powerful), with a lot to explore.

Build and Manage Kubernetes Clusters

Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:50:00 -0400

There are numerous options to build a Kubernetes cluster. If your company has a multi-cloud strategy, most likely you will have to deal with cluster creation on multiple cloud platform or on virtual machines on premise.

Most likely, the chosen cloud platform already make it simple for us. However, it is still important to understand what it really takes to build a Kubernetes cluster. In general, we need to figure out these tasks:

Decide where to host the computing infrastructure (i.e. Node) : on premise or public cloud;
Choose a Kubernetes release: either the vanilla release or one of the third-party distributions;
Install Kubernetes to the computing environment, and integrate it with the cloud platform;
Determine required add-ons (e.g. Istio or Linkerd for Service Mesh, dashboard utility, etc);
Deploy application workload to Kubernetes platform;

A public cloud platform provider usually can assist you with task 1 through 3, and partially 4, depending on the provider. If your Kubernetes resides on private cloud or on-prem environment, you can use a Platform solution such as VMware Tanzu or Openshift, which usually covers task 1, 3 and 4. There is no standard about what task these platform solution must address. Therefore it is important to have this list of tasks in mind in order to make a good comparison. I will discuss each of the tasks in this post.

Hosting environment

Nodes are the building blocks of a Kubernetes cluster. We need master nodes as well as worker nodes. In addition, a working cluster also requires storage, and networking infrastructure.

Public cloud platforms typically provides control plane as a service, obviating administrator’s effort to provision master nodes. For example, the control plane of Azure AKS has two levels of uptime commitment: a free tier of 99.5% SLO and a paid tier with an SLA of 99.95% (using AZs) and 99.9% (without using AZs). This uptime commitment applies to control plane only and do not apply to worker nodes. The management of etcd store is also a responsibility of the cloud provider, which frees up the cluster administrator from managing etcd store. However, they cannot access etcd store either. This is not very convenient because as the size of the cluster grows it is a common requirement to connect to etcd store for troubleshooting purpose.

The deployment APIs for public cloud allow the cluster administrator to define the instance size, count and availability zone for the worker nodes. They also automatically register the worker nodes to control plane so that the cluster administrators do not have to do so by themselves. As to storage, the public cloud usually provide some default storage classes based on their storage as service. For networking device, the cluster provision process automatically configures the cloud API so the cluster can manage cloud resources such as network load balancer.

With private cloud or data centre, we usually use virtual machines, or bare-metal servers. Cluster administrators will need to make their own control plane with master nodes. and install worker nodes and register them to the master nodes. The Kubernetes Installation section below will discuss this.

Kubernetes release

If you have to install Kubernetes, you have to think about the Kubernetes release being used. You can use the binary from official Github repository. For example, the release note of version 1.24.3 points to the change log file for download links to server binaries, node binaries. This is the vanilla Kubernetes release.

Apart from the vanilla release, many developers build their own distributions, based off forks of the Kubernetes project. CNCF has a page to keep track of certified Kubernetes distributions. Some of the distributions are open source and can be used for on-prem infrastructure. Here is a list of top players:

Distribution Name	Repo	Description
EKS Distro	Link	Used in EKS managed service or EKS Anywhere for on-prem infrastructure
AKS Engine	Link	Used in Azure Stack for on-prem infrastructure.
Google Kubernetes Engine	N/A	Used in GKE managed service only.
OpenShift Kubernetes Engine	Link	Community distribution (OKD, or OpenShift Kubernetes Distribution) is the open-source upstream.
Rancher Kubernetes Engine (RKE)	Link	still using Docker as container runtime. Supported CNI include: Canal, Flannel, Calico and Weave
K3s	Link	Lightweight distro without small resource requirement. Great for Edge, IoT, ARM etc
RKE2	Link	Originally named RKE government. Supports deployment via Cluster API. Supports containerd as container runtime. Supported CNI include: Cillium, Calico, Canal and Multus. Lightweight
VMware Tanzu	Link	VMWare Tanzu Grid and VMWare Tanzu Community

Above is just a very incomplete list of Kubernetes distributions. There are many more distributions that are not on this list, such as CoreOS Tectonic, Docker Kubernetes, Heptio, Mesosphere, Mirantis, Platform9, Stackube, Telekube. For full details of how each distribution is different, you will need to go over their documents.

With the selected distribution, we still need to deploy the binaries to the nodes. We can do this with a cluster management platform, or standalone installers. Cluster management platform can also help us with baseline configuration (e.g. IAM integration, CNI plugin), in addition to the binary installation.

Cluster Management Platform

These platforms are also sometimes referred to as container management platform.

For example, OpenShift container platform is a self-managed platform based on OpenShift Kubernetes Engine and can run on a variety of hosting environment, public cloud, or private cloud. The installation steps varies depending on the hosting environment. When running on public cloud such as AWS (aka ROSA), the public cloud only provides computing nodes and associated infrastructure. Many corporate with multi-cluster strategy use this option on public cloud to keep their Kubernetes cluster fleet consistent across cloud vendors.

The Openshift container platform also packages some useful open-source add-ons with corporate support, for example:

Red Hat’s strategy is to pick the most renowned open-source project in each domain and add enterprise support to it. However, for management portal, Red Hat developed its own Advanced Cluster Management tool for Kubernetes, and open-sourced it in 2020 in the upstream project Open Cluster Management.

Similar to OpenShift, VMware Tanzu also attempts to cover the domains, with a smaller product portfolio:

Service Mesh: compatible with Istio
Mission Control: management portal
Observability

Google Anthos is also a container platform. Their product line include, but not limited to:

Anthos Config Management (ACM)
Anthos Service Mesh (ASM, an Istio distribution)

SUSE, the developer of RKE, RKE2, and K3s) offers Rancher as multi-cluster management platform. Apart from the engines, SUSE also offers Lonhorn as a storage solution. However, they do not have offerings for service mesh or GitOps. So there is no doubt that Red Hat OpenShift has the most complete portfolio for Kubernetes.

There are also companies that only offers management platforms without their own Kubernetes distribution. For example:

Product capabilities in this category vary a lot and you should refer to their specific documentation to understand. You will probably see a stack chart from each of the platform provider (e.g. SUSE Enterprise Container, OpenShift, Tanzu, Anthos, Rafay) with all technology integrations.

Cluster Installation Tools

As we saw in the installation steps for OpenShift, they are highly dependent on platform. With public cloud, the provisioning process also applies only to a specific platform. Since Kubernetes Installation process is tedious, some tools emerged to help, for example: kubespray, kubeadm, kops and Cluster API. These are governed by SIG cluster lifecycle special interest group.

Here are some traditional options to install a Kubernetes clusters:

kube-up: the first tool to build cluster from 2015. It has been deprecated.
Kubeadm: a tool built to provide best-practice “fast paths” for creating Kubernetes clusters that are minimum viable, and secure. Kubeadm’s scope is limited to the local node filesystem and the Kubernetes API, and it is intended to be a composable building block of higher level tools. It is first released in Sep 2016. The high level configuration steps goes through initialization (kubeadm init), control plane (kubeadm join control plane), and node (kubeadm join node). Kubeadm does not integrate with cloud providers and it does not install addons (auth, monitoring, CNI, storage class)
Kubespray: runs on bare metal or VMs using Ansible for provisioning and orchestration. The first release was in Oct 2015. Since v2.3 (Oct 2017) kubespray started to use kubeadm internally. In addition to kubeadm, kubespray configures CNI, storage class, other CRI. It supports cloud providers and air-gap environment. However it does not support infrastructure management.

The options above are official options. You may use kubeadm and kubespray to quickly (i.e. in an hour) spin up clusters for education purposes. However, with their limitations, it typically requires a lot of efforts to build a production-grade cluster with the needed addons and integrations.

Apart from the official options, there are also unofficial tools such as kubicorn, which was first introduced in 2018 as a cluster management framework with modular support for cloud providers. However it appears to be short-lived.

In the next two sections, we introduce kops and cluster API, two most recent projects to install cluster.

Kops

The kops utility directly perform the provisioning and orchestration via API to the cloud deployment engine. Kops, with first release in Oct 2016, is tightly integrated with the unique features of the cloud providers (e.g. AWS: ASG, ELB, EBS, KMS, S3, IAM). However, kops is only CLI without controller-style reconciliation. It does not support baremetal or vsphere. It also bundles addons with fixed version.

When picking a tool to install cluster, we need to strike a balance between how much simplification the tool brings, and how many different platform the installer can work with. Kops appears to be such a good compromise. It works with a number of cloud platforms using different set of APIs, although most are in alpha and beta stages today. Here is how to install cluster on AWS.

Both kops and Cluster API have good momentum but they work differently. Cluster API was first released in Mar 2019, and is currently less mature than kops. However, it is declarative and may reflect the direction of where cluster lifecycle management is heading.

Cluster API

Cluster API focuses on following areas:

Manage cluster lifecycle declaratively
Infrastructure abstraction (e.g. computing, storage, networking, security, etc)
Utilizing existing tools (e.g. kubeadm, cloud-init)
Modular and pluggable: to be adaptable to different infrastructure providers.

It involves a number of CRs as illustrated in its diagram. We should be clear on the providers for Bootstrap, Infrastructure and Control Plane.

The biggest benefit is the controller pattern to manage the entire lifecycle of a cluster. This allows managing clusters with GitOps, and rolling upgrade of the cluster. It also allows for declarative node scaling, self healing and multi-cluster management.

The client utility for is clusterctl, and with that along with the manifest, we can create a cluster in a few commands. A lot of workflows are still in development but we can take a look at its quick start guide to get a taste of how it works. The installation steps vary a lot based on the environment and the cluster. Also it introduces the separation of management cluster and workload cluster.

Workload cluster is the target cluster being created, as per the manifests.
Management cluster is where you keep track of the workload cluster being managed. You can manage multiple workload clusters from a single management cluster. Note that this management cluster will store credentials about workload clusters, and may become a single point of failure.

Although Cluster API reflects a great initiative to standardize the provisioning of Kubernetes cluster, whether it will succeed has to do with the level of complexity. In the next section, we will get a taste of how it looks to deploy a Kubernetes cluster in a lab.

Management cluster vs workload cluster

In the lab, I use my MacBook to create a management cluster with KinD. Then we configure a workload cluster in AWS from the management cluster.

Cluster API Lab

Note that the steps here are based on the quick start guide on Cluster API document. Also, there is a bug with the AWS provider so the end of the lab will report a warning. The main purpose of this lab is to demonstrate how Cluster API is supposed to work, even though it still has yet to mature.

To start, I install clusterctl (the cluster API client utility), clusterawsadm (the utility specific for AWS) on MacBook, then start a simple KinD cluster.

curl -L https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/releases/download/v1.2.0/clusterctl-darwin-amd64 -o clusterctl
chmod +x ./clusterctl
sudo mv ./clusterctl /usr/local/bin/clusterctl
clusterctl version

curl -L https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws/releases/download/v1.4.1/clusterawsadm-darwin-amd64 -o clusterawsadm
chmod +x clusterawsadm
sudo mv clusterawsadm /usr/local/bin
clusterawsadm version

kind create cluster

So far, I installed the required utility and a KinD cluster on MacBook. Then I use clusterawsadm to create InstanceProfile, ManagedPolicy and IAM Roles required for cluster creation. The AWS region and access are configured as environment variables:

export AWS_REGION=us-east-1
export AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=AKIAXXXXXXXXXXX
export AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=J8ByduiofpwuisDjDoijOISDs
clusterawsadm bootstrap iam create-cloudformation-stack

This runs a CloudFormation stack to create the permission related resources:

Then I initialize the management cluster with the clusterctl utility, specifying AWS as a provider. I also need to assign the environment variable AWS_B64ENCODED_CREDENTIALS with proper value:

export AWS_B64ENCODED_CREDENTIALS=$(clusterawsadm bootstrap credentials encode-as-profile)
clusterctl init --infrastructure aws

Now I use clusterctl to generate the manifest for the workload cluster. In environment variables, I specify cluster and node sizes, SSH key name, control plane machine type and node machine type:

export AWS_SSH_KEY_NAME=cskey
export AWS_CONTROL_PLANE_MACHINE_TYPE=t3.large
export AWS_NODE_MACHINE_TYPE=t3.large
clusterctl generate cluster myekscluster --kubernetes-version 1.24.3 --control-plane-machine-count=3 --worker-machine-count=3 > capi-quickstart.yaml

kubectl apply -f capi-quickstart.yaml

At the end I tell the management cluster to create a workload cluster as per the manifest, by simply declaring the CRs. It will take some time for the cluster to create, and there are a number of ways to monitor the progress. You can monitor the log on the controller pods in their respect namespaces. You can also check the cluster status with:

kubectl get kubeadmcontrolplane
clusterctl describe cluster myekscluster

Currently there is a bug and the commands at the end will report as below:

Hopefully the bug will be fixed shortly. To delete the cluster, simply delete the resources in the manifest with kubectl delete -f capi-quickstart.yaml

Summary

There are numerous ways to build a Kubernetes cluster. Before deciding on the approach, I recommend having a full understanding of the hosting environment. This is because installation approach and hosting environment are still tightly coupled. This is the status quo and is not going to change in the near future. Both kops and cluster API reflects initiative to decouple the two but both are still in early stage and already facing growing complexity. Cluster API manages complexity with CRDs to abstract system resources and infrastructure, as illustrated here:

CRDs and providers to abstract system resources and infrastructure

The diagram is from the “Cluster API and declarative Kubernetes Management” white paper. Here is a stream with more about the same topic.

Istio Operation Gotchas

Sat, 19 Mar 2022 11:09:00 -0400

In this post I discuss a few aspects when putting istio in operation.

Installation

Istio installation can be confusing, due to architectural and guideline changes as well as renaming of operator CRDs since its release, and especially since 2020. This left lots of information outdated on the web, adding to Istio’s perceived complexity.

Currently, the recommended installation methods are istioctl or Helm. Using Istio Operator manifest (with out istioctl) is discouraged. As to the Helm chart installer, it was once deprecated (around early 2020), but was later re-introduced in the fall of 2021. This back-and-forth had caused some aversion. As of Nov 2021, their re-introduced Helm charts version dropped alpha tag. The Helm repo consists of separate Helm charts, for Istio CRD (base), control plane (istiod), each gateway and CNI respectively. A typical deployment therefore requires multiple Helm Releases (example here). Istio document still considers Helm support as alpha, so I assume the most reliable method to install Istio is istioctl.

The istioctl utility can be used with many options to customize Istio install. For example, we can supply a YAML declaration input (to -f switch) to customize installation behaviours. The YAML file declares a CRD. Two different CRDs have been used: IstioOperator and IstioControlPlane. According to this blog and this post, since Istio 1.5 in early 2020, we’re supposed to IstioOperator CRD exclusively. The IstioControlPlane CRD is left only for legacy support. As stated in the current documentation:

The istioctl command supports the full IstioOperator API via command-line options for individual settings or for passing a yaml file containing an IstioOperator custom resource (CR).

With IstioOperator CRD, we still have a number of options to tweak the install behaviours. Here is a summary of potential options:

use IstioOperator API via IstioOperator CRD (without using “values” or overlay fields)
specify an attribute value in argument, including a pre-built profile e.g. –set meshConfig.accessLogFile=/dev/stdout, –set profile=demo
use K8sObjectOverlay by using “k8s/overlays/patches” field in IstioOperatorCRD
use Helm API by using “values” field in IstioOperatorCRD

The key-value specified in –set switch overrides the same key-value supplied in the IstioOperator CRD. So option 2 overrides option 1. The value for profile can also be empty if you’d rather start from scratch. However too many –set switches makes the command wordy so we should build our own IstioOperator CRD

For option 4, the document hyper-links Helm API to a section from version istio 1.4, and I appears to exist only for legacy (pre-2020 Helm support) compatibility. Option 3 (K8sObjectOverlay) would be helpful when a field cannot be conveniently customized with option 1 and we have to patch the object like in Kustomization.

So the most practical approach is IstioOperator CRD for per-component customization, potentially with K8sObjectOverlay. No matter which option, istioctl compiles the installation manifest before applying it against Kubernetes API. This manifest can be previewed using “istioctl manifest” command, so that you can take a look before installation.

Thank you Isito for so much confusion just to land on a working installation method. Below is the content of az-istio-operator.yaml file that I use for my installation:

apiVersion: install.istio.io/v1alpha1
kind: IstioOperator
metadata:
 name: istio-install-customization
spec:
 profile: default
 hub: docker.io/istio
 tag: 1.13.1
 revision: 1-13-1
 namespace: istio-system
 meshConfig:
 accessLogFile: /dev/stdout
 outboundTrafficPolicy:
 mode: "REGISTRY_ONLY"
 components:
 pilot:
 k8s:
 hpaSpec:
 maxReplicas: 7
 minReplicas: 1
 nodeSelector:
 beta.kubernetes.io/os: linux
 ingressGateways:
 - name: istio-ingressgateway
 #namespace: istio-ingress
 enabled: true
 label:
 istio: ingressgateway
 k8s:
 hpaSpec:
 maxReplicas: 11
 minReplicas: 1
 serviceAnnotations:
 service.beta.kubernetes.io/azure-load-balancer-internal: "true"
 service.beta.kubernetes.io/azure-load-balancer-internal-subnet: "my-lb-subnet"
 egressGateways:
 - name: istio-egressgateway
 enabled: true

I can preview the install, run the install and validate installation status:

$ istioctl manifest generate -f az-istio-operator.yaml
$ istioctl install -f az-istio-operator.yaml -y --verify
$ istioctl verify-install -f az-istio-operator.yaml
$ kubectl -n istio-system get IstioOperator installed-state-istio-install-customization-1-13-1 -o yaml | less

Note that in the IstioOperator declaration I marked the revision. This is helpful when I run multiple versions of control plane (e.g. during upgrade). I can check revisions of istiod with:

$ istioctl x revision list

We can delete installed istio components

$ istioctl x uninstall -f az-istio-operator.yaml
$ istioctl x uninstall --revision 1-11-5

In practice, it is helpful to use separate operators each for a different component (pilot, ingressGateways, egressGateways). This makes maintenance and upgrade easier.

Debugging

The documentation has a page for common problems that one needs to be familiar with. It covers not only problems, but also steps to troubleshoot each kind of problem (e.g. authorization policy).

Although istioctl is pretty confusing as an installation tool, it is a good utility for many troubleshooting activities. We should probably add its path to PATH environment variable and add the export command (e.g. export PATH=”$HOME/istio/bin:$PATH“) to .zshrc or .bashrc. Istioctl has a few useful subcommands, some of which are only available as experimental and therefore needs to be following an x. Some common commands are given below:

To analyze Istio problems:

$ istioctl analyze -n istio-system

To look at proxy configuration of an Envoy instance at different levels, use proxy-config sub-command or pc for shorthand:

$ istioctl proxy-config <clusters|listeners|routes|endpoints|bootstrap|log|secret|stats>
$ istioctl pc cluster deploy/istio-ingressgateway -n istio-system # see what Envoy cluster an ingress gateway knows about
$ istioctl proxy-config log deploy/httpbin --level "rbac:debug"
$ istioctl pc log <pod_name> -n <namespace> --level connection:debug
$ istioctl pc secret -n istio-system deploy/istio-ingressgateway # check certificates loaded to a gateway
$ istioctl proxy-config listeners deploy/istio-ingressgateway -n istio-system # query envoy listener configuration
$ istioctl pc routes deploy/istio-ingressgateway -n istio-system --name http.8080 # query envoy route configuration

The last two commands set logging level to the specified workload. If we want to set logging level at mesh level, we can use these commands:

$ istioctl admin log --level authorization:debug
$ istioctl admin log

To look at synchronization status of each envoy in the mesh, use proxy-status sub-command, or ps for shorthand:

$ istioctl ps # ensure data plane is in sync

If an item for a workload shows STALE instead of SYNCED, it means that the configuration has not been pushed from control plane to that instance of Envoy proxy. Check if the Istio configuration change is valid. If the system is newly installed and there is no ingress or egress gateway resources declared, the RDS column for ingress or egress may show “NOT SENT”. The far right column displays the version of istiod connected.

To describe applied istio config:

$ istioctl describe <pod|service>
$ istioctl describe po workload1 -n my-workload # detect misconfigurations on workload

To view dashboard:

$ istioctl dashboard <envoy|grafana|prometheus>

To check authorization policy on a Pod,

$ istioctl x authz check mypod -n workload

To validate istio configuration in a file:

$ istioctl validate -f resource_authorization_policy.yaml

Sometimes we need to turn on access logging just on the envoy proxy on the Gateway Pod. In that case, we will need to apply Istio’s Envoy filter object. This filter is applied to Pods labelled as gateway. It patches the existing filter chain with the additional defined in the manifest:

apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
kind: EnvoyFilter
metadata:
 name: hcm-gw-access-log
 namespace: istio-system
spec:
 workloadSelector:
 labels:
 istio: ingressgateway
 configPatches:
 - applyTo: NETWORK_FILTER
 match:
 context: GATEWAY
 listener:
 filterChain:
 sni: demo.digihunch.com
 filter:
 name: "envoy.filters.network.http_connection_manager"
 patch:
 operation: MERGE
 value:
 typed_config:
 "@type": "type.googleapis.com/envoy.extensions.filters.network.http_connection_manager.v3.HttpConnectionManager"
 access_log:
 - name: envoy.access_loggers.file
 typed_config:
 "@type": "type.googleapis.com/envoy.extensions.access_loggers.file.v3.FileAccessLog"
 path: /dev/stdout
 format: "[%START_TIME%] \"%REQ(:METHOD)% %REQ(X-ENVOY-ORIGINAL-PATH?:PATH)% %PROTOCOL%\" %RESPONSE_CODE% %RESPONSE_FLAGS% \"%UPSTREAM_TRANSPORT_FAILURE_REASON%\" %BYTES_RECEIVED% %BYTES_SENT% %DURATION% %RESP(X-ENVOY-UPSTREAM-SERVICE-TIME)% \"%REQ(X-FORWARDED-FOR)%\" \"%REQ(USER-AGENT)%\" \"%REQ(X-REQUEST-ID)%\" \"%REQ(:AUTHORITY)%\" \"%UPSTREAM_HOST%\" %UPSTREAM_CLUSTER% %UPSTREAM_LOCAL_ADDRESS% %DOWNSTREAM_LOCAL_ADDRESS% %DOWNSTREAM_REMOTE_ADDRESS% %REQUESTED_SERVER_NAME% %ROUTE_NAME%\n"

The object above enables access logging on the Gateway Pods only, without impacting other Envoy proxies.

Multi-tenancy

In large enterprises, Istio is usually installed by a platform/operation team. The entire platform is shared by multiple application teams. Istio should not be seen as a responsibility of a single party. It is necessary to break down the Istio CRDs and define the responsibility of each CRD. For example:

Gateways are placed in the istio-system namespace (or a dedicated istio-ingress namespace in some case). Platform team can decide whether a Gateway is considered a shared infrastructure, or each tenant (application team) uses their own Gateway. In the servers/hosts field of Gateway declaration, add namespace before host to suggest that the routing behaviour of that host must be defined in a certain namespace.
Virtual Services can be managed in two models as well. They can be managed individually and are all placed in each tenant namespace. Alternatively in a shared responsibility model, Virtual Service can be created in istio-system namespace, and the processing of each match can be delegated to a Virtual Service in each tenant namespace, using the Delegate feature of Virtual Service. Another field that can help with multi-tenancy is the “gateways” field, you can specify a value of mesh to indicate the virtual service is available to the entire mesh.
Destination Rules are usually placed in each Tenant’s workspace
Peer Authentication also depends on the configuration. If a mesh level configuration is enforced, it is easier for the Platform Team to manage it and this should be the setup for new clusters. If for historical reasons Peer Authentication is enforced per tenant namespace, it can be delegated to each application team. It can make communication troubleshooting more complex.
Control Plane and observability workloads such as Kiali are usually the responsibility of Platform team.
Request Authentication and Authorization Policy should be the responsibility of individual application team.

In a multi-tenancy management model, Istio related resource should be subject to admission control policy, as well as scrutiny by the security and platform teams. Google Anthos has a good page on the constraint templates for Istio resources.

As to restricting traffic between namespaces, apart from the measures from this previous post, we can also use Sidecar CRD to restrict outbound traffic. As its documentation states:

Sidecar describes the configuration of the sidecar proxy that mediates inbound and outbound communication to the workload instance it is attached to. By default, Istio will program all sidecar proxies in the mesh with the necessary configuration required to reach every workload instance in the mesh, as well as accept traffic on all the ports associated with the workload. The Sidecar configuration provides a way to fine tune the set of ports, protocols that the proxy will accept when forwarding traffic to and from the workload. In addition, it is possible to restrict the set of services that the proxy can reach when forwarding outbound traffic from workload instances.

The documentation page also includes two examples. The first is a sidecar at the mesh level that restricts outbound traffic to the same namespace that the sidecar is in, and the istio-system namespace:

apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: Sidecar
metadata:
 name: default
 namespace: istio-config
spec:
 egress:
 - hosts:
 - "./*"
 - "istio-system/*"

The second example overrides the mesh level default above, and allows egress traffic to three specified namespaces:

apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: Sidecar
metadata:
 name: default
 namespace: prod-us1
spec:
 egress:
 - hosts:
 - "prod-us1/*"
 - "prod-apis/*"
 - "istio-system/*"

As to inbound control, we can expose a Virtual Service to other namespaces by using the exportTo field to specify which other namespaces the Virtual Service should be exported to. If no namespaces are specified then the virtual service is exported to all namespaces by default.

Sometimes we want a virtual services to expose to both outside of the mesh via Ingress, and within the mesh, and we hope to use the same hostname. For this requirement, we can use the ServiceEntry CRD. ServiceEntry enables adding additional entries into Istio’s internal service registry.

Certified Kubernetes Administrator (CKA) Exam

Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:50:00 -0400

The Certified Kubernetes Administrator (CKA) exam is a hands-on session where you need to follow the instructions to configure the system in a bash terminal on the web browser. In my experience, some shortcut keys (such as Alt+F) do not work, which slows me down a little bit. For each question, you need to switch kubectl context as instructed in the question. Some questions share the same context so it is very easy to omit this step. You can verify response with your own command but will not be told whether you scored in each question. During the CKA exam I tried to spin up a terminal session from within Vim editor and the terminal ran out of buffer. I had to reboot the machine with the help of proctor, and my completed work are saved.

In general this is an exam I enjoy preparing and writing because it is very hands on. Result is out a day after, and I passed at 96%. I heard about tight timelines but I managed to finish 15 minutes before the end, most likely owing to my dexterity with Linux commands. With that I’m happy to share my notes in preparation for the CKA exam.

For taking CKA exam, we should be familiar with the diagram above.

Tips for Troubleshooting

The CKA exam is hands-on and therefore requires quite a bit of troubleshooting. Here are my notes.

Check Node status to start with
Check core services on each node:
- sudo systemctl status kubelet
- sudo systemctl status docker
- sudo journalctl -u kubelet
- sudo journalctl -u docker
Check component logs (on hosting VM)
- /var/log/kube-apiserver.log
- /var/log/kube-scheduler.log
- /var/log/kube-controller-manager.log
If cluster is built by kubeadm, then some of those services are running in Pods within kube-system namespace. Check those pods:
- run interactive shell: > kubectl exec podname –stdin –tty — /bin/sh
- there is an image for lots of useful network tool called nicolaka/netshoot

Store pod names to variable. e.g. > POD_NAME=$(kubectl get pods -l run=nginx -o jsonpath=”{.items[0].metadata.name}”)
With kubectl, you may
- alias it to k for faster typing
- –dry-run: to run imperative command without creating object
- –record: record the command that was used to make a change
- -o: set output format, wide, yaml, or jsonpath=”expression”. For example, to get pod name: > kubectl get pods -l run=nginx -o jsonpath=”{.items[0].metadata.name}”
- –sort-by: use JSONPath expression
- –selector: filter results by label

Build K8s cluster using kubeadm

The CKA exam requires you to know how to build cluster with kubeadm. This involves installing four components (docker-ce, kubeadm, kubectl and kubelet), as outlined below:

step	command
1. Install docker-ce	> curl -fsSL https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu/gpg \| sudo apt-key add - > sudo add-apt-repository \ "deb [arch=amd64] https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu \ $(lsb_release -cs) \ stable" > sudo apt-get update > sudo apt-get install -y docker-ce=18.06.1~ce~3-0~ubuntu > sudo apt-mark hold docker-ce > sudo systemctl status docker
2. Install kubeadm, kubelet and kubectl	> curl -s https://packages.cloud.google.com/apt/doc/apt-key.gpg \| sudo apt-key add - cat << EOF \| sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/kubernetes.list deb https://apt.kubernetes.io/ kubernetes-xenial main EOF > sudo apt-get update > sudo apt-get install -y kubelet kubeadm kubectl > sudo apt-mark hold kubelet kubeadm kubectl
3. Form a K8s cluster	On master node: > sudo kubeadm init --pod-network-cidr=10.244.0.0/16 This command prints out a command for worker nodes to join.	On worker node: sudo the command generated on master
4. Configure kubectl	On master node: > mkdir -p $HOME/.kube > sudo cp -i /etc/kubernetes/admin.conf $HOME/.kube/config > sudo chown $(id -u):$(id -g) $HOME/.kube/config	Optionally on worker node: > mkdir -p $HOME/.kube then scp $HOME/.kube/config from control plane node
5. Set up cluster networking	> echo "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables=1" \| sudo tee -a /etc/sysctl.conf > sudo sysctl -p Then from any environment with kubectl, bring up the system pods for cluster networking > kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/coreos/flannel/master/Documentation/kube-flannel.yml

Add new node to KubeAdm cluster

This is fairly simple with the help of kubeadm. The node to join cluster must be able to communicate with master node. Create a token and print join command from master node:

> kubeadm token create --print-join-command

Then from the node to join, run this command as sudo. You will see that it performs the TLS bootstrap for you. Once completed, the standard output will say this node has joined the cluster. You can confirm with command:

> kubectl get nodes

Sometimes one needs to migrate pods to the newly joined node. This can be done by draining the existing nodes.

Note you can also use kubespray to build K8s cluster as previously discussed, and here is a my IaC project to launch AWS instances and build a K8s cluster with kubespray on top of it. For my learning, I often create a GKE (Google Kubernetes Engine) cluster from GCP’s cloudshell. There is a guide on how to start a cluster but it comes down to three commands:

$ gcloud config set compute/zone us-east1-b
$ gcloud container clusters create tcluster --num-nodes=3
$ gcloud container clusters get-credentials tcluster

The third command above is to configure kubectl on the cloudshell. Follow this guide if you need to SSH to node.

Upgrade KubeAdm cluster

This involves upgrade three components (kubeadm, kubectl and kubelet) on two types of node: master node and worker node. They steps vary slightly for two nodes. But drain and uncordon is needed for both types of nodes. Pick a node and follow the steps below:

Step	Command
1. drain the node from kubectl client (e.g. master node)	> sudo kubectl drain nodename --ignore-daemonsets
2. Determine kubeadm target version	> apt-mark showhold > sudo apt-mark unhold kubeadm kubectl kubelet > apt list --installed \| grep kube > apt-cache show kubeadm \| less > sudo apt-get install -y kubeadm=1.20.2-00
3. update kubeadm	On master node: > sudo kubeadm upgrade plan v1.20.2 > sudo kubeadm upgrade apply v1.20.2	On worker node: > sudo kubeadm upgrade node
4. On the node to update, determine target version for kubectl and kubelet, then install	> apt-cache show kubectl \| less > apt-cache show kubelet \| less > sudo apt-get install -y kubectl=1.20.2-00 kubelet=1.20.2-00
5. Restart kubelet	> sudo systemctl daemon-reload > sudo systemctl restart kubelet
6. Uncordon	> kubectl uncordon nodename

Backup and restore Etcd

Etcd is a distributed key-value store. It uses Raft protocol for distributed consensus. Etcd is the third distributed system I touch on. The previous two are: Cassandra (using Paxos protocol for distributed consensus) and ZooKeeper (using ZAB protocol). Here is a good article that summarizes the protocols. As for the exam we only need to use etcd with the client tool.

The etcd itself can run on a cluster of servers, each running etcd as a systemd service as etcd/etcd (user/group). It can be deployed in two ways:

stacked etcd: an instance of etcd lives with kube-api-server on the same control plane node
external etcd: in a dedicated cluster of etcd

Alternatively, etcd can run as a pod, most likely in kube-system namespace.

The etcd service listens on port 2379 for client communication and on port 2380 for server (peer-to-peer) communication. When the systemd service was initialized there are a few key environment variables (e.g. cert locations, ETCD_DATA_DIR) privoded as configuration. To see them, run:

> cat /etc/systemd/system/etcd.service | grep Env

These environment variables (prefixed with ETCD_) are for the service only. They can provide current configuration information for us to use later. When it’s running as a pod, check out the directory for static pod for the yaml declaration (e.g. /etc/Kubernetes/manifests/etcd.yaml), where these parameters are passed in as environment variable.

The etcdctl utility is a command line client for etcd. The default API version is 3 so no need any more to set ETCDCTL_API=3 before each command. The utility needs three arguments three arguments (–cacert, –cert, and –key) but we can pass the information via environment variables:

> export ETCDCTL_CACERT= /home/cloud_user/etcd-certs/etcd-ca.pem
> export ETCDCTL_CERT= /home/cloud_user/etcd-certs/etcd-server.crt
> export ETCDCTL_KEY= /home/cloud_user/etcd-certs/etcd-server.key
> export ETCDCTL_ENDPOINTS=https://etcd1:2379

The environment variable names are uppercase of the argument name with prefix ETCDCTL_. Only global options of arguments can be supplied via environment variables. They remain effective throughout the rest of activities. Also note that the CACERT is needed only when client-cert-auth is true. Now to backup, we can simply run:

> etcdctl snapshot save /home/cloud_user/etcd_backup.db

To restore from a file, you want to remove existing etcd data directory first. The directory can be found in ETCD_DATA_DIR variable. Suppose it is /var/lib/etcd, you need root permission to write to it, then correct ownership before starting the service:

> sudo systemctl stop etcd && sudo mv /var/lib/etcd/ /tmp/
> sudo etcdctl snapshot restore /home/cloud_user/etcd_backup.db --data-dir /var/lib/etcd
> sudo chown -R etcd:etcd /var/lib/etcd && sudo systemctl start etcd

To verify the restore result, simply run:

> etcdctl get cluster.name

Object Management

In the CKA exam, we need to interact with many types of built-in Kubernetes objects.

RBAC objects:
- A Role defines permissions within namespace.
- A ClusterRole defines cluster-wide permissions.
- Both Roles and ClusterRoles are K8s objects that defines a set of permissions
- RoleBinding and ClusterRoleBinding are objects that connect Roles and ClusterRoles to users.
Service Account: an account used by container processes within Pods to authenticate the K8s API. If your Pods need to communicate with the K8s API, you can use service accounts to control their access.

Inspect resource usage either with a K8s Metrics Server, or by command:

> kubectl top pod --sort-by <JSONPATH> --selector <selector>

Here is a good guide to install metrics server and dashboard (e.g. on docker-desktop).

Pods and Containers

ConfigMaps: store data in key-value map.
Secrets: same as ConfigMaps but for sensitive data only
Two ways to pass ConfigMap and Secret data to your container:
- As environment variables in container operating system
- As files presented on mounted volumes in container file system.
Container Resource management:
- Resource requests: K8s scheduler will use resource requests to avoid scheduling pods on nodes that do not have enough available resources. 1 CPU unit = 1/1000 of one core
- Resource limits: allow you to limit the amount of resources your containers can use. The container runtime is responsible for enforcement. The enforcement behaviour is different. For example, some terminates container that attempts to use more resource than the limit.
Probes
- Liveness Probe: automatically determine whether or not a container application is in a healthy state. By default K8s does not consider a container to be down until the container process stops. Liveness Probe allow you to customize this detection mechanism and make it more sophisticated.
- Startup Probes: similar to liveness probes. However, while liveness probes run constantly on a schedule, startup probes run at container startup and stop running once they succeed. Startup probes are used to determine when the application has successfully started up. It is especially useful for legacy applications that can have long startup times.
- Readiness Probes: determine when a container is ready to accept requests. When you have a service backed by multiple container endpoints, user traffic will not be sent to a particular pod until its containers have all passed the readiness checks defined by their readinesse probes. Use readiness probes to prevent user traffic from being sent to pods that are still in the process of starting up.

Restart policy for self-healing pods
- (default) Always: container will always be restarted if they stop, even if they completed successfully (returned 0).
- OnFailure: container will be restarted if the container process exists with an error code, or the container is determined to be unhealthy by a liveness probe.
- Never: let it be
Multi-container pods:
- containers share the same networking namespace and can communicate with one another on any port, even if the port is not exposed to the cluster
- Container can use volumes to share data in a Pod. Example: a legacy application is hard-coded to write log output to a file on disk. You use a sidecar container to read the log file from shared volume and prints it to the console so the log output will appear in the container log.
Init containers: containers that run once during the startup process of a pod. A pod can have any number of init containers, and they will each run once into completion, before the next init container starts. You may use init containers to perform a variety of startup tasks, they can contain and use software and setup scripts that are not needed by your main containers. They are often useful in keeping your main containers lighter and more secure by offloading startup tasks to a separate container. Use case include:
- cause a pod to wait for another K8s resource to be created before finishing startup
- perform sensitive startup steps securely outside of app containers
- populate data into a shared volume at startup
- communicate with another service at startup
Scheduling: Scheduler (a component in control plane) assigns Pods to a suitable Node so kubelets can run them. The factor taken into account:
- resource request vs available node resources
- various configurations that affect scheduling using node labels
Pod allocation
- nodeSelector is an attribute of Pod to allow you to limit which Node(s) the Pod can be scheduled on. The selector is based on label.
- nodeName is an attribute of Pod that allows you to bypass scheduling and assign Pod to a specific Node by name.
DaemonSet: automatically runs a copy of a Pod on each node. When a new node is added to the clsuter, DaemonSet will run a new copy of the Pod on it. DaemonSets also respect normal scheduling rules around node labels, taints and tolerations. If a pod would not normally be scheduled on a node, a DaemonSet will not create a copy of the Pod on that node.
Static Pod: A Pod that is managed directly by the kubelet on a node, not by the K8s API server. They can run even if there is not K8s API server present. Kubelet automatically creates static Pods from YAML manifest files located in the manifest path on the node.
Mirror Pod: Kubelet will create a mirror Pod for each static Pod. Mirror Pods allow you to see the status of the static Pod via the K8s API, but you cannot change or manage them via the API.
Taints: applied to nodes to repel a set of pods. A taint specifies key-value and effect. Effect can be NoSchedule or NoEffect. The former prevents pods without matching tolerations to schedule to the tainted node. The latter also evicts pre-existing pods with no matching toleration.
Tolerations: applied to pods so they can be scheduled to nodes with matching taints. A toleration consists of key-value pair, effect and operation. The operation can be Equal or Exists. To determine whether a toleration matches a taint. The keys and the effects must be the same. In addition:
- the operator is Exists (and thus no value should be specified in the toleration); or
- the operator is Equal, and all the values match those of the taints;

Now we have three ways to influence the scheduling behaviour. The first, is simply by specifying nodeSelector on the Pod, with the required the node label. The second, as just discussed, is to use Taints and Tolerations. The third way, is similar to the first, using nodeAffinity attributes on Pods. nodeAffinity is more powerful and flexible than nodeSelector by supporting more complex scheduling rules (e.g. matching rules).

Use Node Affinity when your scheduling rule is based on direct condition, i.e. schedule a Pod to this Node when XXX. In this case, you have well-known labels on nodes, and specify nodeAffinity on Pods.
Use Taints and Tolerations when your scheduling rule is based on inverse statement, i.e. do not schedule a Pod to this Node unless XXX. In this case, you put a taint “MyCondition:NoSchedule” on a Node, so that no Pod will ever get scheduled to this Node. The only exception is when a Pod has the Toleration “MyCondition:NoSchedule”.

Deployments

Deployment is an object that defines a desired state for a ReplicaSet (a set of replica Pods). The Deployment Controller seeks to maintain the desired state by creating, deleting, and replacing Pods with new configurations.
With Deployments, you can horizontally scale an application up and down by changing the number of replicas. You can perform rolling updates and rollback.

Networking

The K8s network model defines how Pods communicate with each other, regardless of which Node they are running on.
Each Pod has its own unique IP address within the cluster. Any Pod can reach any other Pod using that Pod’s IP address. This creates a virtual network that allows Pods to easily communicate with each other.
One type of K8s network plugin is CNI plugin. It has many flavours such as Calico. Each plugin has its own unique installation process. Kubenetes nodes will remain NotReady until a network plugin is installed.
The K8s virtual network uses a DNS (e.g. a Kubeadm cluster uses CoreDNS pod in kube-system namespace) to allow Pods to locate other Pods and Services using domain names. The Pod DNS name follows this format: pod-ip-address.namespace.pod.cluster.local
A K8s NetworkPolicy is an object that allows you to control the flow of network communication to and from Pods so you can isolate traffic. NetworkPolicy can apply to Ingress (using from selector), Egress (using to selector) or both.
NetworkPolicy has an attribute podSelector to determine to which Pods in the namespace the NetworkPolicy applies, by selecting Pods by with Pod labels.
By default, Pods are considered non-isolated and completed open to all communication. If any NetworkPolidy selects a Pod, the Pod is considered isolated and will only be open to traffic allowed by NetworkPolicies.
A variety of selector can be used: podSelector, namespaceSelector, ipBlockSelector and port.

Services

Services provide a way to expose an application running as a set of pods, so clients can access applications in an abstract way without needing to be aware of the application pods. In this model, client make requests to a Service, which routes traffic to its pods in a load-balanced fashion
Endpoints are the backend entities to which Services route traffic. If there are multiple Pods behind a service, each Pod will have an endpoint associated with the service.
Each service has a type that determines how and where service will expose your application.
- ClusterIP: expose application inside the cluster network
- NodePort: expose application outside the cluster network
- LoadBalancer: expose application outside thecluster network, but use an extermal cloud load balancer from cloud platform.
Services are assigned with DNS names. The FQDN follows this format: service.namespace.svc.cluster-domain.example, which is used by pods across namespaces
Pods within the same namespace can reference service simply by service name.
To manage external access to service, you can also use Ingress object. Ingress object is capable of providing more functionality than a simple NodePort Service, such as SSL termination, advanced load balancing, or name-based virtual hosting. You must install one or more Ingerss controller (many different implementations) to back up the ingress objects.
Ingress defines a set of routing rules. Each rule has a set of paths, each with a backend. Requests matching a path will be routed to its associated backend.
If a Service uses a named port, an ingress can also use the port’s name (instead of port number) to choose to which port of a service it will route.

Storage

Volumes allow you to store data outside the container file system, while allowing the container to access the data at runtime. When Pod is gone, volumes do not persist.
Persistent Volumes are a slightly more advanced form of Volume. They allow you to treat storage as an abstract resource and consume it in Pods. PV can be provisioned separately by storage administrator, and they persist regardless of pod lifecycle. PV needs to be claimed by pods. PV uses a set of attributes to describe the underlying storage resource.
Both volumes and PVs each have a volume type: NFS, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP), ConfigMaps and Secrets, Simple Directory on node
Two volume types to distinguish:
- hostPath: store data in a specified directory on K8s node
- emptyDir: store data in dynamically created location on the node. The directory exists only as long as the Pod exists on the node. The directory and the data are deleted as Pod is removed. This type is useful for simply sharing data between containers in the same pod.
Both volumes and PVs are specified under Pod, and individual containers must include volumeMounts object to map volume name to local mountPath
Storage Class object allow K8s admins to specify the types of storage services they offer on their platform. A key property is allowVolumeExpansion. This allows PVC to resize. At storage class level, there are two reclaim policies: Retain and Delete. The default is Delete.
PV has an attribute named persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy. This is reclaim policy at PV level. If the attribute is not defined, it is inherited from storage class. The persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy has three options. When PVC is deleted:
- Retain: keeps all data but requires admin to manually reclaim the volume (i.e. delete PV, clean up data, delete storage asset)
- Delete (cloud storage only): deletes both PV and the underlying storage resource automatically
- Recycle: scrub (rm -rf /vol/) all data in the underlying storage resource, and allow the volume to be reused.
PVC represents a user’s request for storage resources. It defines a set of attributes similiar to those of a PV. When a PVC is created, it will look for a PV that is able to meet the requested criteria. If it finds one, it will automatically be bound to the PV. PVC can be mounted to a Pod’s containers just like any other volume

In general the CKA exam experience is quite positive and rewarding. In future posts I will shift focus on Kubernetes not only for the CKA exam, but also for keeping track of my learning.

Good luck with your CKA exam.