azure kubernetes service on Digi Hunch

Workload Identity on Kubernetes 1 of 2 – AKS

Sat, 23 Dec 2023 16:43:00 -0400

As applications are moved to the cloud, the application workload hosted on virtual machines need to interact with cloud resources. For this, we need an IAM solution with two mechanisms:

a (non-human) identity in the cloud service platform (CSP), to represent the application;
a way to grant permission to this identity, so it can manage resources

CSPs such as Azure and AWS have their own implementations of the two mechanism. In Azure, we have Entra workload identity (including service principal and managed identity) for the first mechanism, and Azure roles for the second. On AWS, they are the identity pool capability of Amazon Cognito and IAM role. Next, what about the workload on managed Kubernetes service? Essentially, we will need to more mechanisms:

a native Kubernetes identity to represent the workload (Pod);
a way to map the Kubernetes identity to the identity in CSP

Kubernetes Service Account is designed for the first item. The second mechanism is for the CSP to address. In this post, let’s examine this in Azure. Specifically, how does Azure manage workload identity with Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS).

Node Identity and Cluster Identity in AKS

Let’s define what exactly is a workload identity. In Azure we think of it as one type of non-human identity. In our context, workload identity in the broader sense contains:

the identity that represents the control plane (or the whole cluster)
the identity that represents the node (or kubelet process)
the identity that represents the application in a Pod (workload identity in the narrow sense);

So it is important not to confuse these identities. In this section, I’ll focus on 1 and 2 since they are part of workload identity in the broad sense. In the rest of the sections, I’ll discuss 3, and use the narrow sense of workload identity.

When we create an AKS cluster, we create both a cluster control plane and a node pool. Both the control plane and the nodes need to provision cloud resources using Cloud API from Azure. For example, if we use Terraform’s AzureRM provider to create an azurerm_kubernetes_cluster resource, then we specify the cluster’s identity using service_principal or identity block. We specify the nodes’ identity using the kubelet_identity block, because kubelet is the process that runs on each node.

Even though a cluster builder might be tempted to assign the same identity to both Control plane and kubelet, the security best practice is to keep them separated. It is also the responsibility of the cluster builder to distinguish activities by the control plane and by kubelet process on each node, and attache an Azure Role with minimum privilege to each of the identities.

These two types of identities (control plane and kubelet) are relatively straightforward. In order to use them, we don’t have to play with Kubernetes objects. In the next section, we’ll continue to discuss the identities that represents each Pod in Azure. We now refer to them as workload identities, but the first available technology was pod managed identity.

Pod Managed Identity in AKS

When I first worked on Azure Kubernetes, Pod managed identity was in preview and was the recommendation. However, Microsoft renamed it (to Microsoft Entra pod-managed identities) and then deprecated it after a couple years of preview. As of Oct 2022, the recommended mechanism becomes Microsoft Entra Workload ID. For simplicity, we refer to the deprecated mechanism as “Pod Identity”. We discuss pod identity only for the purpose of understanding why it is no longer recommended and what is missing in it. For new workload deployment, we should always use workload identity.

For Pod Identity to work, a feature flag EnablePodIdentityPreview must turn on. Pod Managed Identity operates on a Kubernetes controller called MIC (Managed Identity Controller) and a DaemonSet called NMI (Node Managed identity). You start with an Azure managed identity with appropriate roles. Once you installed Pod Identity, there will be two CRDs AzureIdentity and AzureIdentityBinding. To grant Azure permissions to a Pod, you create a CR for each CRD. The AzureIdentity CR connects to your Azure managed identity. You also create an AzureIdentityBindign CR. When declaring a Pod, you link to AzureIdentityBinding by using the label aadpodidbinding.

There are two problems with pod managed identity. First, there is a vulnerability when it works with kubenet as network plugin. This vulnerability requires an additional mitigation step. Second, it does not make use of Kubernete’s Service Account. Let’s discuss in the next section why it’s favourable to use Kubernetes’ ServiceAccount.

Kubernetes Service Account

In Kubernetes RBAC model, Service Account can bind to Roles to gain access to other Kubernetes resources. The most common use case is allowing the running application in a Pod to access other Kubernetes resources. When it comes to letting an application in Pod access cloud resources in the CSP, it makes sense to use Service Account, for a a consistent pattern.

A service account must carry a token to function. Each namespace has a default service account with the token mounted automatically. Each Pod created in a namespace uses the default service account of the namespace, unless otherwise specified. However, many security organizations do not considered this default behaviour as the best practice. For example, CIS Kubernetes benchmark 1.8 has these two recommendations:

Ensure that the default service accounts are not actively used (5.1.5)
Ensure that Service Account Tokens are only mounted where necessary (5.1.6)

In other words, we should create non-default service account with automountServiceAccountToken set to false. Then when declaring a Pod, we explicitly specify the service account and where to grab the token for the service account. One way to pass ServiceAccount token is through volume projection.

To allow a Pod to access Azure resources, we use the combination of Kubernetes Service Account and Microsoft Entra workload identity.

Workload Identity for AKS

Microsoft introduced Entra Workload Identities in late 2022 to address IAM issues around machine identities. It comes with some modern features such as conditional access (e.g. location-based access, anomaly sign-in detection, etc). A workload identity can be:

application: an abstract entity as the global representation of your application for use across all tenants;
service principal: the local representation of a global application object in a specific tenants;
managed identity: a special type of service principal that eliminates the need for developers to manage credentials

In our use case for AKS workload, we also make use of Azure’s Managed Identity. This part is the same as the pod identity mechanism. However, here we create a federated identity credential for managed identity. The OIDC federated identity credential is issued by the AKS cluster. Within the AKS, the service account references the identity by client_id. Here is the documentation for the whole process.

One of the improvements in Entra workload identity for AKS, is the use of service account, which obviates the use of CRDs. Another improvement is the use of federated identity, whose lifecycle is tied to the cluster. This pattern is not only neater, but also standard. We map a service account to a managed identity with federated credential.

Summary

On managed Kubernetes services, we need an integration mechanism to grant Kubernetes workload access to cloud resources. We discussed what’s needed in this integration mechanism and looked at Azure Kubernetes as an example. In the next post, we’ll discuss how this issue is addressed in Elastic Kubernetes Service on the AWS side.

Kubernetes Storage on Azure 3 of 3 – Ceph by Rook

Fri, 26 Aug 2022 19:43:00 -0400

In the last two posts, I covered the native storage options on Azure Kubernetes Service, as well as Portworx as an example of a proprietary Software Defined Storage (SDS) solution. There are also a number of open-source alternative SDS solutions. Ceph has nearly a decade of history from prior to containerization, and is the most widely adopted storage platform. In this post, we continue to explore Ceph as an open-source storage solution on Azure Kubernetes.

Ceph by Rook

Ceph is an open-source SDS platform for distributed storage on a cluster and provides object, block and file storage. Installation of Ceph SDS can be complex, especially on Kubernetes platform. Rook is a graduated CNCF project to orchestrate storage platform. Rook by itself is not SDS and it supports:

Ceph: configure a Ceph cluster. Think of this as the equivalent of cephadm on Kubernetes platform.
NFS: configure an NFS server. Think of this as the equivalent of nfsd daemon on Kubernetes platform.
Cassandra: an operator to configure a Cassandra database cluster. It is now deprecated.

We play with Rook Ceph. I also refer to it as Ceph by Rook. The contribution of Rook project is it simplifies the installation as a matter of declaring custom resources using CRDs. Here are some high-level CRDs to know:

CephCluster: creates a Ceph storage cluster
CephBlockPool: represents a block pool
CephFilesystem: represents a file system
CephObjectStore: represents an object store
CephNFS: spins up a NFS Ganesha server to export NFS shares of a CephFilesystem or CephObjectStore.

As with typical Kubernetes resources in controller pattern, Ceph by Rook needs an operator along with custom resources. We can use YAML manifest for both of them, and the manifests are usually very tediously long. We can also use Helm to install both of them, by providing a value file. Now we will install Ceph on AKS.

Install Ceph Operator on AKS

The steps are influenced by two relevant posts (here and here). However, I’ve incorporated the cluster configuration in the Azure directory of the cloudkube project, a modular Terraform template to configure AKS cluster and facilitate storage configuration. The node group and instance sizes are selected to be just enough to run a ceph POC cluster with minimum cost. One of the node groups is tainted with storage-node, as if the following command were run:

kubectl taint nodes my-node-pool-node-name storage-node=true:NoSchedule

You will only need to taint the nodes with the command above if you choose not to use the cloudkube template. The taint ensures that only Pods with corresponding toleration and effect can be scheduled to those nodes.

We use Helm to install Rook Operator. We need a value file (e.g. rook-ceph-operator-values.yaml) with content as below:

# https://github.com/rook/rook/blob/master/Documentation/Helm-Charts/operator-chart.md
crds:
 enabled: true
csi:
 provisionerTolerations:
 - effect: NoSchedule
 key: storage-node
 operator: Exists
 pluginTolerations:
 - effect: NoSchedule
 key: storage-node
 operator: Exists
agent:
 # AKS: https://rook.github.io/docs/rook/v1.7/flexvolume.html#azure-aks
 flexVolumeDirPath: "/etc/kubernetes/volumeplugins"

Then we install the operator with Helm:

helm install rook-ceph-operator rook-ceph --namespace rook-ceph --create-namespace --version v1.9.6 --repo https://charts.rook.io/release/ --values rook-ceph-operator-values.yaml
kubectl -n rook-ceph get po -l app=rook-ceph-operator

After installing the operator, we check the Pod status to make sure it is running. Then we can install the actual Ceph Cluster in one of the two ways. We can declare a CephClusterCRD ourself, or we can use Helm again to declare the CRD. Helm Chart gives us a lot of useful default values and saves us from editing a large body of YAML manifest.

Install Ceph CR on AKS

We use Helm to install CephCluster CRD. We create a value file (e.g. rook-ceph-cluster-values.yaml) with content as below:

# https://github.com/rook/rook/blob/master/Documentation/Helm-Charts/ceph-cluster-chart.md
operatorNamespace: rook-ceph
toolbox:
 enabled: true
cephObjectStores: [] # by default a cephObjectStore will be created. Setting this to null disables it
#cephBlockPools: # by default a cephBlockPool will also be created with default values
#cephFileSystems: # by default a cephFileSystem will also be created with default values

cephClusterSpec:
 mon:
 count: 3
 volumeClaimTemplate:
 spec:
 storageClassName: managed-premium
 resources:
 requests:
 storage: 10Gi
 resources:
 limits:
 cpu: "500m"
 memory: "1Gi"
 requests:
 cpu: "100m"
 memory: "500Mi"
 dashboard:
 enabled: true
 storage:
 storageClassDeviceSets:
 - name: set1
 # The number of OSDs to create from this device set
 count: 3
 # IMPORTANT: If volumes specified by the storageClassName are not portable across nodes
 # this needs to be set to false. For example, if using the local storage provisioner
 # this should be false.
 portable: false
 # Since the OSDs could end up on any node, an effort needs to be made to spread the OSDs
 # across nodes as much as possible. Unfortunately the pod anti-affinity breaks down
 # as soon as you have more than one OSD per node. The topology spread constraints will
 # give us an even spread on K8s 1.18 or newer.
 placement:
 topologySpreadConstraints:
 - maxSkew: 1
 topologyKey: kubernetes.io/hostname
 whenUnsatisfiable: ScheduleAnyway
 labelSelector:
 matchExpressions:
 - key: app
 operator: In
 values:
 - rook-ceph-osd
 tolerations:
 - key: storage-node
 operator: Exists
 preparePlacement:
 tolerations:
 - key: storage-node
 operator: Exists
 nodeAffinity:
 requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
 nodeSelectorTerms:
 - matchExpressions:
 - key: agentpool
 operator: In
 values:
 - storagenp
 topologySpreadConstraints:
 - maxSkew: 1
 # IMPORTANT: If you don't have zone labels, change this to another key such as kubernetes.io/hostname
 topologyKey: topology.kubernetes.io/zone
 whenUnsatisfiable: DoNotSchedule
 labelSelector:
 matchExpressions:
 - key: app
 operator: In
 values:
 - rook-ceph-osd-prepare
 resources:
 limits:
 cpu: "500m"
 memory: "4Gi"
 requests:
 cpu: "500m"
 memory: "2Gi"
 volumeClaimTemplates:
 - metadata:
 name: data
 spec:
 resources:
 requests:
 storage: 100Gi
 storageClassName: managed-premium
 volumeMode: Block
 accessModes:
 - ReadWriteOnce

During the cluster provisioning, there will be a number of preparing Pods. We want those Pods to run on nodes with label agentpool=storagenp. In real life, we need to orchestrate where to run each workload, by restricting the nodes to schedule certain types of workload.

Then we can install the cluster using Helm:

helm install rook-ceph-cluster rook-ceph-cluster --namespace rook-ceph --create-namespace --version v1.9.6 --repo https://charts.rook.io/release/ --values rook-ceph-cluster-values.yaml

After running the Helm install, it may take as long as 15 minutes for all resources to settle. Watch the Pod status in rook-ceph namespace. At the end, make sure that the cluster is created successfully:

kubeadmin@pro-sturgeon-bastion-host:~$ kubectl -n rook-ceph get CephCluster
NAME DATADIRHOSTPATH MONCOUNT AGE PHASE MESSAGE HEALTH EXTERNAL
rook-ceph /var/lib/rook 3 15m Ready Cluster created successfully HEALTH_OK
kubeadmin@pro-sturgeon-bastion-host:~$ kubectl -n rook-ceph get cephBlockPools
NAME PHASE
ceph-blockpool Ready
kubeadmin@pro-sturgeon-bastion-host:~$ kubectl -n rook-ceph get cephFileSystems
NAME ACTIVEMDS AGE PHASE
ceph-filesystem 1 20m Ready

In my case it took 15 minutes before the cluster comes up as created successfully. You should notice that two storage classes were also created as a part of the install. It however did not create a storage class or CRD for object storage, because we explicitly disabled it in the Helm value file by setting cephObjectStores value to null.

Dashboard

We enabled dashboard. To configure the dashboard view properly, we would need an ingress. For a quick view here, we can play port forwarding tricks. First we fetch the admin password for use in the next step. Then expose the dashboard to the bastion host:

$ kubectl -n rook-ceph get secret rook-ceph-dashboard-password -o jsonpath='{.data.password}' | base64 -d
$ kubectl -n rook-ceph port-forward svc/rook-ceph-mgr-dashboard 8443:8443

Since I don’t have UI on the bastion host, I use the port forwarding trick again from my own MacBook. Start a new terminal and SSH to the bastion host with port-forwarding switch:

$ ssh -L 8443:localhost:8443 kubeadmin@20.116.132.8

The command above suppose the public IP of the bastion host is 20.116.132.8. Then from my MacBook I can browse to localhost:8443 (with Safari browser which gives me the option to bypass certificate error). At the web portal, provide username (admin) and password (as retrieved above):

Ceph console for Kubernetes

Apart from the dashboard, we can also use ceph admin tool from a toolbox pod, following this instruction. For monitoring, Ceph by Rook can expose metrics for Prometheus to scrape.

Performance

With default ceph configuration on AKS, I ran quick performance test using kube-str . The result is as follows:

	read_iops	write_iops	read_bw	write_bw
ceph-block	IOPS=464.507294 BW(KiB/s)=1874	IOPS=243.296143 BW(KiB/s)=989	IOPS=509.928162 BW(KiB/s)=65797	IOPS=248.530762 BW(KiB/s)=32338
ceph-filesystem	IOPS=438.701324 BW(KiB/s)=1770	IOPS=226.270660 BW(KiB/s)=920	IOPS=405.936340 BW(KiB/s)=52456	IOPS=208.869293 BW(KiB/s)=27229

The metrics reflects performance under default configuration. It should not be considered as the best performance that Ceph can deliver on Azure Kubernetes.

Summary

I discussed three storage options for Azure Kubernetes but the idea applies to other Kubernetes platform hosted on a CSP. The native storage has significant limitation. NFS has latency. Block storage does not address high availability at the storage layer. Portworx and LINSTOR fill that gap as a commercial solution. Ceph is based on Object storage.

Kubernetes Storage on Azure 2 of 3 – Portworx

Fri, 12 Aug 2022 15:23:00 -0400

In the previous post, we have discussed built-in storage classes on Azure Kubernetes. Further to that, we will examine some third-party software defined storage (SDS) options that are compatible with Azure Kubernetes Service in this post. Then we take Portworx on Azure as an example. Although, these options are specific to Azure, most of the players also have solutions for other managed Kubernetes platforms. Also, the methodology to study storage options remain the same regardless of cloud service provider.

In fact, I touched on software defined storage (SDS) in the context of general non-containerized workload in a separate post. In short, storage providers decouple the SDS appliance from the full storage solution in order to lower the cost and increase flexibility. To the storage consumer (e.g. a process running on Linux OS), SDS can present a block disk or file system. There are also SDS solution that can host your own object storage and we will discuss that later. In fact, SDS has gained significant popularity in recent years. For example, the report “Validating Software-Defined Storage Operating Models for the Enterprise” by archiectingit divided the evolution into four phases and cited that Gartner predicts the SDS revolution to reach 50% of the storage market by 2024, from 15% in 2020.

This post discusses SDS in the context of container storage. Then we will install Portworx on Azure Kubernetes.

SDS for Kubernetes

Many SDS appliances also developed the capability to present storage volumes to containerized workload. I put together a list of SDS products that works on Azure with their supported access modes:

Solution	Licence	Development and Support	Access Mode
Portworx	Closed source. Free Essential tier. Enterprise features on License.	Commercially supported by PureStorage	RWO, RWX
Ceph by Rook	Open source. Rook is a graduated CNCF project.	Developed and commercially supported by Red Hat, Canonical and SoftIron	RWO, ROX, RWX
OpenEBS	Open source. Sandbox CNCF project.	Developed and commercially supported by MayaData et al.	RWO
Longhorn	Open source. Incubating CNCF project.	Originally developed by Rancher, and commercially supported by SUSE	RWO
StorageOS	Closed source. License required.	Commercial support by Ondat.	RWO
LINBIT	Open-source with enterprise plans	Enterprise support

RWO is the most commonly supported mode. The report “Performance Benchmarking Cloud Native Storage Solutions for Kubernetes” makes a comparison of performance among some of the options in early 2021. Another potentially opinionated comparison list is by LINBIT.

Portworx is a leading player with commercial SDS solution and I will test its free Essential tier in the rest of this post. Ceph is one of the most mature leading open-source offering and I will test it in the next post.

For Portworx, we can use the terraform template cloudkube for Azure. The template assigns the kubelet’s managed identity as contributor of the node resource group. The template also creates a bastion host with direct SSH access to the nodes.

Portworx Operator on Azure

We use Portworx Operator to configure storage cluster. Portworx has an instruction for AKS but it is not tailored to specific identity model. For simplicity, use my cloudkube Terraform template to create the AKS cluster, and skip the “Prepare Your AKS Platform” page. Instead, follow the “Deploy Portworx using Azure managed identity on new AKS cluster” page starting at step 7.

At that step, we need to create a secret with the client ID of the managed identity for node agent. The terraform template outputs the BYO identity’s client ID. After cluster creation, we simply SSH to the bastion host and create the secret using the output.

To install Porworx using operator, we can follow a wizard in PX-central. If this is the first time, we need to create an account and log in to the portal. If this is not the first time and you have previously created a cluster, you need to detach that cluster by going to Profile from bottom left corner on the portal page.

Follow the guide in “Install Portworx on AKS using the Operator“. In the wizard, click on “Portworx Essentials” for free tier, or “Portworx Enterprise” for the 30-day trial. Then select operator with latest version. In the rest of the wizard steps, select options applicable to Azure environment. The last step will present two kubectl commands to install operator and install the CR. Run the command to install operator and verify result:

kubectl apply -f 'https://install.portworx.com/2.9?comp=pxoperator'
kubectl -n kube-system get deployment portworx-operator

Portworx Custom Resource

To install the CR, we need to customize the given manifest in order to use our managed identity. We can download the YAML manifest (portworx_essentials.yml) and modify it in text editor. As the page “Deploy Portworx using Azure managed identity on new AKS cluster” suggest at step 9: in the env section, remove the AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET and AZURE_TENANT_ID sections but keep the AZURE_CLIENT_ID section. My CRD declaration looks like this:

# SOURCE: https://install.portworx.com/?operator=true&mc=false&kbver=&oem=esse&user=myuserid&b=true&kd=type%3DPremium_LRS%2Csize%3D150&s=%22type%3DPremium_LRS%2Csize%3D150%22&c=my-very-long-px-cluster-id&aks=true&stork=true&csi=true&mon=true&tel=false&st=k8s&promop=true
kind: StorageCluster
apiVersion: core.libopenstorage.org/v1
metadata:
 name: my-very-long-px-cluster-id
 namespace: kube-system
 annotations:
 portworx.io/install-source: "https://install.portworx.com/?operator=true&mc=false&kbver=&oem=esse&user=myuserid&b=true&kd=type%3DPremium_LRS%2Csize%3D150&s=%22type%3DPremium_LRS%2Csize%3D150%22&c=my-very-long-px-cluster-id&aks=true&stork=true&csi=true&mon=true&tel=false&st=k8s&promop=true"
 portworx.io/is-aks: "true"
 portworx.io/misc-args: "--oem esse"
spec:
 image: portworx/oci-monitor:2.10.2
 imagePullPolicy: Always
 kvdb:
 internal: true
 cloudStorage:
 deviceSpecs:
 - type=Premium_LRS,size=150
 kvdbDeviceSpec: type=Premium_LRS,size=150
 secretsProvider: k8s
 stork:
 enabled: true
 args:
 webhook-controller: "true"
 autopilot:
 enabled: true
 monitoring:
 prometheus:
 enabled: true
 exportMetrics: true
 featureGates:
 CSI: "true"
 env:
 - name: AZURE_CLIENT_ID
 valueFrom:
 secretKeyRef:
 name: px-azure
 key: AZURE_CLIENT_ID
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
 name: px-essential
 namespace: kube-system
data:
 px-essen-user-id: aaaabbbbccccddddmyverylongpxessenuserid
 px-osb-endpoint: ssssssyyyyyyyzzzzzzmyverylongpxosbendpoint

In this custom resource manifest, I specify to get the cluster to create disk from Azure, even though it has the capability of using an existing disk. Then apply the CRD manifest:

 kubectl apply -f portworx_essentials.yml

This will take up to 10 minutes to create several related resources. There are several check points to ensure the cluster is created successfully. Here are some useful commands:

kubectl -n kube-system get po # all Pods related to portworx should be ready and running, especially the portworx-api ones
kubectl -n kube-system get storagecluster # the status should report online
PX_POD=$(kubectl get pods -l name=portworx -n kube-system -o jsonpath='{.items[0].metadata.name}') 
# get the name of one of the portworx Pod for storage cluster
kubectl -n kube-system exec -c portworx -it $PX_POD --tty --stdin -- /opt/pwx/bin/pxctl status 
# should report "Status: PX is operational" with valid license loaded
kubectl get sc # portworx related storage classes are available

The pre-built storage classes are not CSI based. However, CSI should be automatically enabled in recent operator versions. We should create our own CSI storage classes and PVCs using our own storage classes. Here are two examples:

kind: StorageClass
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
 name: px-csi-database
provisioner: pxd.portworx.com
parameters:
 repl: "2"
 priority_io: "high"
 io_profile: "db"
---
kind: StorageClass
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
 name: px-csi-artifact
provisioner: pxd.portworx.com
parameters:
 repl: "2"
 priority_io: "medium"
 io_profile: "sequential"

That is a bare minimum Portworx installation. Check out their documentation for the full features. With this minimum install we can go to the section “Validate Persistent Storage” from the previous post to validate the persistent volume.

For troubleshooting purpose, pxctl is the utility and it is available on Portworx Pods.

Performance

We care not only the functionality, but also the performance. So I ran a quick performance test using kube-str, using all default configuration. The result is as follows:

	read_iops	write_iops	read_bw	write_bw
px-csi-database	IOPS=969.614136 BW(KiB/s)=3894	IOPS=729.698059 BW(KiB/s)=2935	IOPS=1172.772827 BW(KiB/s)=150639	IOPS=691.626526 BW(KiB/s)=89053
px-csi-artifact	IOPS=780.681946 BW(KiB/s)=3139	IOPS=682.522766 BW(KiB/s)=2746	IOPS=773.548584 BW(KiB/s)=99549	IOPS=659.015320 BW(KiB/s)=84890

Note that those numbers reflect performance under default configuration, and they should not be considered as the best performance that Portworx can deliver on Azure Kubernetes. Before moving to production, it is important to establish your own test parameters that best represents the container workload, and then iterate through different parameters for the storage class based on the requirement and performance output.

Kubernetes Storage on Azure 1 of 3 – built-in storage and NFS

Sun, 31 Jul 2022 15:22:00 -0400

In the previous post, we understand that to host stateful workload, we need to manage persistent storage to the Kubernetes platform. In this post, I will explore the different storage options. These options are specific to Azure Kubernetes service. However, the principals apply to any Kubernetes platform regardless of cloud vendor.

In another old post, I discussed in-tree and CSI storage classes, and from a developer’s perspective, how to mount volumes statically and dynamically once the storage class is available. Here in this post we are concerned with how to make storage classes available, from a platform specialist perspective.

Storage in Azure Kubernetes

As soon as the Azure Kubernetes cluster is launched, a number of built-in storage classes are available. Unlike third-party storage classes, they do not require kubelet identity to be contributor for node resource group. As discussed we shall use CSI based storage classes.

managed-csi
managed-csi-premium
azurefile-csi
azurefile-csi-premium

The main difference between them is the backing technology. However, form Kubernetes workload’s perspective, the Pods as storage consumers are concerned with the access mode instead of backing technology. Here are supported access modes:

ReadWriteOnce: read-write by a single node
ReadOnlyMany: read only by many nodes
ReadWriteMany: read-write by many nodes
ReadWriteOncePod: new in Kubernetes 1.22 to restrict volume access to a single Pod

The storage classes managed-csi and managed-csi-premium support ReadWriteOnce. The storage classes azurefile-csi and azurefile-csi-premium support ReadWriteMany.

Apart from these built-in options, Azure also suggests a few more options based on other types of Azure resources. For example, AKS can integrate with HPC cache and it for HPC. We can also self-manage a virtual machine configured as NFS server, and use the NFS subdir external provisioner to configure storage class. Despite of the overhead with managing a VM, you have more configurability. My previous client reports that they gain better performance than the built-in options.

Another alternative is Azure NetApp Files. However, being a full enterprise grade solution (similar to FSx ONTAP), Azure NetApp Files costs an arm and a leg. In this comparison, it cost 60 to 100 times as the cost by built-in options.

Another option is Azure Ultra Disk, which needs to be enabled at cluster level. You can provision performance target (DiskIOPSReadWrite and DiskMBpsReadWrite) in the storage class. Ultra Disk is a good middle ground between the pricey NetApp files and the less performant built-in options.

Terraform Template for AKS

To explore the storage options, I use my own terraform template to create an AKS cluster. The template is in the azure directory of the cloudkube repo. The template consists a few configurations with Azure Kubernetes to facilitate storage configuration. First, it configures an SSH key pair to use between the bastion host and the node. Users can SSH to Kubernetes nodes from bastion host as soon as terraform apply is completed. Second, the third party storage options installed after the cluster creation need their Pod to instruct Azure to create Azure disks. This requires that a Kubernetes node agent have the permission to provision resources in the node resource group. This is important to understand because there are a couple of managed identities at play (refer to this post) when building an AKS cluster.

In Azure Kubernetes, it is the managed identity of kubelet, that needs to have contributor permission over the resource group for the nodes (not the one for the AKS cluster itself). A managed identity is expressed by a client ID, an object ID (aka principal ID), and the identity ID. We can find them out with an AZ CLI command as below:

We can also tell that the kubelet managed identity represents node agent, by connecting to a node and looking at the argument (kubernetes.azure.com/kubelet-identity-client-id) of kubelet process:

In the template, I also chose to designate the same BYO identity for both the cluster and for kubelet (node agent), in order to minimize my requirement on permission. If I had left it with a system assigned identity for node agent, I would have to assign that identity as a contributor for the node resource group, either as a user, or via Terraform’s identity. Either way, it is beyond what a Contributor is allowed to do.

Benchmarking with kubestr

I used fio utility for storage benchmarking from virtual machines. However, fio utility is not for container. For fio testing on Kubernetes, I’d have to use a Docker image, and test with target volume attached. Fortunately, the Kasten team shared their initiative in the open source project Kubestr. The kubestr release is available as an executable on common platforms. It connects to the cluster the same way as kubectl and here is a demo. To begin with, download the utility to bastion host, and run it without any argument, which prints the storage classes and volume snapshot classes:

curl -L -o kubestr.tar.gz https://github.com/kastenhq/kubestr/releases/download/v0.4.31/kubestr_0.4.31_Linux_amd64.tar.gz
tar -xvf kubestr.tar.gz && rm kubestr.tar.gz && chmod +x kubestr

./kubestr # if kubectl is configured, this command will print out the details of storage classes and volume snapshot classes

In addition to outputting details, it is also very simple to perform storage benchmarking with kubestr. All we need to do is giving it the storage class name and it will run four tests by default with common global options (ioengine=libaio verify=0 direct=1 gtod_reduce=1). The four tests are:

JobName	block_size	filesize	iodepth	rw
read_iops	4k	2G	64	randread
write_iops	4k	2G	64	randwrite
read_bw	128k	2G	64	randread
write_bw	128k	2G	64	randwrite

During each test, it measures and reports IOPS and bandwidth (throughput). If your I/O profile falls out of the four jobs, you can even customize your test by supplying a fio config file. For example, you need a longer test duration, or you need a larger total size for the test. Before the test, kubestr automatically mount their test volumes using the storage class being tested.

./kubestr fio -s my-storage-class # benchmarking a storage class

For read_iops and write_iops, we mainly look at the IOPS. For read_bw and write_bw, we mainly look at the bandwidth. The iops and bw based on samples are reported as first line of result, followed by min, max and average.

Metrics

With kubestr I ran a performance test amongst the native storage classes with Azure Kubernetes Service, with results as below:

	read_iops	write_iops	read_bw	write_bw
managed-csi	IOPS=314.729797 BW(KiB/s)=1275	IOPS=297.071136 BW(KiB/s)=1204	IOPS=315.311188 BW(KiB/s)=40887	IOPS=261.048645 BW(KiB/s)=33941
managed-csi-premium	IOPS=493.395844 BW(KiB/s)=1990	IOPS=426.731812 BW(KiB/s)=1723	IOPS=455.950348 BW(KiB/s)=58894	IOPS=422.888855 BW(KiB/s)=54662
azurefile-csi	IOPS=259.333282 BW(KiB/s)=1053	IOPS=283.985779 BW(KiB/s)=1152	IOPS=240.447403 BW(KiB/s)=31298	IOPS=230.689804 BW(KiB/s)=30048
azurefile-csi-premium	IOPS=394.044739 BW(KiB/s)=1586	IOPS=371.181793 BW(KiB/s)=1494	IOPS=380.360535 BW(KiB/s)=49018	IOPS=491.313446 BW(KiB/s)=63310

These numbers are based on default test parameters (e.g. 100Gi PVC size). The numbers indicate that block storage generally performs better in default setting. So we should use managed disk instead of azure file unless multiple pods needs to access the same volume.

Validate Persistent Storage

We can use mysql as a quick and dirty test of storage classes. We can deploy the following manifest:

apiVersion: v1
kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
metadata:
 name: mysql-pvc
spec:
 storageClassName: managed-csi-premium # the storage class being tested
 accessModes:
 - ReadWriteOnce
 resources:
 requests:
 storage: 5Gi
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
 name: mysql
data:
 password: eHl6  # base64 code of xyz
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
 name: mysql
 labels:
 app: mysql
spec:
 replicas: 1
 selector:
 matchLabels:
 app: mysql
 template:
 metadata:
 labels:
 app: mysql
 spec:
 containers:
 - image: mysql:5.6
 name: mysql
 env:
 - name: MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD
 valueFrom:
 secretKeyRef:
 name: mysql
 key: password
 ports:
 - containerPort: 3306
 name: mysql
 volumeMounts:
 - name: mysql-persistent-storage
 mountPath: /var/lib/mysql
 volumes:
 - name: mysql-persistent-storage
 persistentVolumeClaim:
 claimName: mysql-pvc
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
 name: mysql-service
 labels:
 service: mysql
spec:
 selector:
 app: mysql
 ports:
 - name: tcp-mysql
 protocol: TCP
 port: 3306
 targetPort: 3306

Once the Pod has been created, then we use a throw-away Pod to connect to mysql service and build some data:

$ kubectl run mysql-cli --rm -i --tty --image imega/mysql-client -- /bin/sh
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
/ # mysql --host=mysql-service.default.svc.cluster.local --user=root --password=xyz
Welcome to the MariaDB monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. Your MySQL connection id is 9 Server version: 5.6.51 MySQL Community Server (GPL) Copyright (c) 2000, 2018, Oracle, MariaDB Corporation Ab and others. Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the current input statement. MySQL [(none)]>

From the mysql shell, we create a test database with dummy data populated:

CREATE DATABASE `testdb`; 
USE testdb; 
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS tasks ( 
 task_id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY, 
 title VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, 
 description TEXT, 
 created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP 
) ENGINE=INNODB; 
INSERT INTO tasks (title, description) VALUES ('Job A','Morning Standup');
INSERT INTO tasks (title, description) VALUES ('Job B','Latte with two shots of espresso');
INSERT INTO tasks (title, description) VALUES ('Job C','Coding coding and coding');
INSERT INTO tasks (title, description) VALUES ('Job D','git commit');

Each SQL command should return with number of rows affected and then we can exit the MySQL shell and Pod shell. Once we exit out of the Pod shell, the Pod is deleted. We can re-connect to validate the data are still present:

$ kubectl run mysql-tester --rm -i --tty --image imega/mysql-client -- mysql --host=mysql-service.default.svc.cluster.local --user=root --password=xyz --database testdb --execute='SELECT * FROM tasks;'
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
Got error: Access denied for user 'root'@'147.206.3.15' (using password: NO)
+---------+-------+----------------------------------+---------------------+
| task_id | title | description | created_at |
+---------+-------+----------------------------------+---------------------+
| 1 | Job A | Morning Standup | 2022-06-22 20:29:12 |
| 2 | Job B | Latte with two shots of espresso | 2022-06-22 20:29:12 |
| 3 | Job C | Coding coding and coding | 2022-06-22 20:29:12 |
| 4 | Job D | git commit | 2022-06-22 20:29:13 |
+---------+-------+----------------------------------+---------------------+
Session ended, resume using 'kubectl attach mysql-tester -c mysql-tester -i -t' command when the pod is running
pod "mysql-tester" deleted

The output validates the persistent storage of the data. When testing a different storage class, simply start over with a different storage class specified in the PVC part of the manifest.

Summary

This post focuses on storage options for persistent volumes on Azure Kubernetes service. I use my own Terraform template with some custom configuration. I also covered kubestr as benchmarking tool and ran it against the built-in storage classes.

In some situations, the built-in options do not suit your needs. For example, you might want your application to use persistent volume in a consistent way across multiple cloud vendors. We will have to resort to third-party software defined storage layer. In the next post, I will explore a couple of SDS-based options, namely Portworx and Ceph. The custom configurations in the Terraform template will be helpful when we configure Portworx.

Kubernetes Admission Control

Fri, 07 Jan 2022 22:21:00 -0400

This post discusses admission control, and its implementation – the OPA Gatekeeper. I also discuss Azure Policy as a different Gatekeeper implementation.

Admission Webhooks

Admission controller intercepts requests to the Kubernetes API server after the request has been authenticated and authorized, and prior to persistence of the object into etcd store. There are many compiled-in controllers, which can be turned on and off on the node with the arguments of kube-apiserver process. For example, the ImagePolicyWebhook can be enabled with value ImagePolicyWebhook added to the –enable-admission-plugins switch. Its configuration can be provided via the –admission-control-config-file switch.

In addition to the compiled-in admission plugins (which must be configured for kube-apiserver process on the node), admission plugins can be developed as extensions and run as webhooks configured at runtime. This allows users to configure webhooks via API access, dynamically without having to restart kube-apiserver process on the Node, which is usually hard to do with managed Kubernetes platforms. They are therefore called Dynamic Admission Control.

You can define two types of admission webhooks in dynamic admission control: validating admission webhook, and mutating admission webhook. Their interaction with API server can be illustrated in the diagram below:

The mutating admission hook takes action to change the API request, whereas the validating admission hook accepts or denies the request.

A good example of mutating webhook is Istio’s sidecar injector. We can view the configuration with this command:

$ kubectl get MutatingWebhookConfiguration istio-sidecar-injector -o yaml | less

From the manifest returned, we can see that in this configuration the request is forwarded to istiod service on port 443, at path /inject for processing. We can also see some matching rules to find the target Pod creation API request.

Validating webhook can be display with the following call:

$ kubectl get ValidatingWebhookConfiguration

The output of validating webhook is a yes or no decision. We usually use validating webhook in conjunction with a policy engine to decide whether the request should be accepted or denied.

Open Policy Agent

Open Policy Agent (OPA) is an open-source general-purpose policy engine that applies policies written in Rego language to ingested JSON document and returns a result. It is usually integrated with system which requires a policy engine. For example, Kyverno is a policy engine designed for Kubernetes. Styra (one of the OPA contributors) develops policy engines to integrate with Istio’s authorization policy. They have online courses on OPA policy authoring and microservice authorization with their product.

OPA is build to be a general-purpose, unified way of solving policy and authorization problem. With microservice authorization, the activities includes decision making (determine action based on input, aka Policy Decision Point, PDP), and decision enforcement (issue 400 code or 200 code depending on decision, aka Policy Enforcement Point, PEP). OPA is introduced to decouple these two activities. OPA’s input is a JSON payload and it uses Policy in Rego language to come to decision.

The team that developers Open Policy Agent also created their controller (with OPA as the core component) to run validating web hook and mutating web hook. The original version is OPA-Kubernetes that uses kube-mgmt. This original version is also dubbed Gatekeeper v1.0. When OPA starts, the kube-mgmt sidecar container will load Kubernetes Namespace and Ingress objects into OPA. You can configure the sidecar to load any kind of Kubernetes object into OPA. The sidecar establishes watches on the Kubernetes API server so that OPA has access to an eventually consistent cache of Kubernetes objects. It has gone through a couple of major version changes as summarized in this section. As of today, when we deploy Gatekeeper we should use version 3.

Gatekeeper v3

Currently, Gatekeeper v3 is the most popular choice for Kubernetes Policy Controller. The diagram bellow illustrate how Gatekeeper integrates with Kubernetes API server.

Gatekeeper and Kubernetes

We can follow this guide to install Gatekeeper but the key step is as simple as to apply the correct version of manifest. Alternatively it can be installed using Helm. After the installation, we should see a Service named gatekeeper-webhook-service in the gatekeeper-system namespace. We can also inspect the newly created validationg web hook configuration

k get validatingwebhookconfiguration gatekeeper-validating-webhook-configuration -o yaml | less

The result indicates that the configuration forwards incoming manifests to the gatekeeper-webhook-service web service at the path /v1/admin for validation, and then at /v1/admitlabel for labelling. The configuration also stores rules as matching criteria.

We can smoke test Gatekeeper v3, with the basic example in its directory. Apply the template, constraint and then the manifests in resources. The pod creation will fail with an error like:

Error from server ([pod-must-have-gk] you must provide labels: {"gatekeeper"}): error when creating "resources/bad_pod_namespaceselector.yaml": admission webhook "validation.gatekeeper.sh" denied the request: [pod-must-have-gk] you must provide labels: {"gatekeeper"}

The gatekeeper document also covers the details of using ConstraintTemplate and Constraints. However, Writing your own a policy in Rego still takes time and we want to piggyback on the community for commonly used policies. OPA‘s gatekeeper-library projects keeps a handful of those in its library directory. We can test the privileged container example:

$ cd gatekeeper-library/library/pod-security-policy/privileged-containers
$ kustomize build . | kubectl apply -f -
constrainttemplate.templates.gatekeeper.sh/k8spspprivilegedcontainer created
$ kubectl apply -f samples/psp-privileged-container/example_disallowed.yaml
pod/nginx-privileged-disallowed created
$ kubectl delete -f samples/psp-privileged-container/example_disallowed.yaml
pod "nginx-privileged-disallowed" deleted
$ kubectl apply -f samples/psp-privileged-container/constraint.yaml
k8spspprivilegedcontainer.constraints.gatekeeper.sh/psp-privileged-container created
$ kubectl apply -f samples/psp-privileged-container/example_disallowed.yaml
Error from server ([psp-privileged-container] Privileged container is not allowed: nginx, securityContext: {"privileged": true}): error when creating "samples/psp-privileged-container/example_disallowed.yaml": admission webhook "validation.gatekeeper.sh" denied the request: [psp-privileged-container] Privileged container is not allowed: nginx, securityContext: {"privileged": true}

Currently the library directory contains two sub-directories, general and pod-scurity-policy. The latter is to regulate Pod creation, while the former includes more common usecases such as disable node port, enforce https, and enforce probes. This is the place I start with when building a policy.

The policy constraints take effect cluster wide. When we have multiple clusters, we would like a unified place to manage policies.

Azure Policy with AKS

We take Azure Policy with AKS as an example to illustrate how public cloud platform can simplify policy management. When building AKS cluster, an addon profile for Azure Policy can be installed. This allows Azure Policy to connect to the AKS cluster. Azure Policy contains many built-in policies definitions (as well as initiative definitions which are groups of related policies). We can simply search by Kubernetes keyword and look for the built-in policies. For example, there is a built-in policy definition “Kubernetes clusters should not allow container privilege escalation. The definitions (policy or initiative) can be assigned to a resource group with enforcement action set to denied, and with excluded namespaces, as shown in the screenshot below

The assignment can take as long as 10 minutes to push down to the cluster. Then we should be able to confirm by checking the constraint CRDs. We can see this This setup brings a centralized policy management system that can be easily hooked up to multiple clusters.

Other benefits of this architecture includes the ability to report compliance. As per CIS report for Azure AKS recommendation 4.3:

Azure Policy extends Gatekeeper v3, an admission controller webhook for Open Policy Agent (OPA), to apply at-scale enforcements and safeguards on your clusters in a centralized, consistent manner. It covers many basic resource types but does not cover any well-known CRDs. Azure Policy makes it possible to manage and report on the compliance state of your Kubernetes clusters from one place.

Checks with Azure Policy service for policy assignments to the cluster.
Deploys policy definitions into the cluster as constraint template and constraint custom resources.
Reports auditing and compliance details back to Azure Policy service.

As of February 2022, AWS EKS doesn’t seem to have the equivalent of this capability to integrate with a policy management. The only option would be to install Gatekeeper v3 yourself on the cluster, or host it separately.

Bottom line

Admission control should be a standard setup in Kubernetes deployment. When building gatekeeper system on your own, it can be set up separately on a different cluster. When Kubernetes is provided as a platform, it is very helpful for platform operator to manage their tenants. If the tenant is application development team, it also makes sense for them to develop their own policies for the developers in their team.

AKS Lessons Learned 2 of 2

Sat, 18 Dec 2021 01:18:00 -0400

Even though Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is a managed service, building a cluster is not trivial. For help resources, I would start with the webinar “Configure Your AKS cluster with Confidence” from April 2021, which focuses on a set of working best practices (convention over configuration) but obviously not every recommendation suits every use case. For a deeper technical tour, the John Savill’s Technical Training channel has good videos (from 2020) on AKS overview, high availability and networking. Lastly, there is also an AKS checklist to remind you of the implementation details to consider.

All the references aside, I need to write down some gotchas from my implementation experience in the last two month.

Identity and Access Management

AKS is a special type of Azure resource in the sense that it manages other Azure services on user’s behalf. Therefore the access management needs to consider several aspects:

Access Type	Mechanisms involved	Example
User access Kubernetes API	Azure AD, Azure RBAC and Kubernetes RBAC. – Azure AD is for authentication – Azure RBAC for Kubernetes – Kubernetes RBAC	A user connects to Kube-API server using kubectl
AKS access other Azure resource	There are several identities that represents different components of AKS. For example, the AKS cluster, the node agent pool, and each add-on. The AKS cluster can be represented as a service principal, or managed identity (system assigned or user assigned). The node agent pool can be represented as a managed identity	AKS cluster connects to a VNet in a different resource group. (requiring cluster’s identity to have network contributor role on the target network resource group) AKS node agent pulls images from ACR (requiring the node agent pool’s identity to have ArcPull role on the target ACR)
Pod access other Azure resource	AAD-Pod Managed Identity	Business workload connects to managed database service such as PostgreSQL on Azure.
Pod access Kubernetes API	Access Kubernetes API using Service Account. This issue is solved completely by Kubernetes native mechanisms. Roles and ClusterRoles defines permissions. RoleBindings and ClusterRoleBindings associates Service Accounts with permissions	Workload access ConfigMap, Secret etc.

In the first access type, for RBAC with user to access Kubernetes API, there is an overlap between Azure RBAC and Kubnernetes RBAC. Azure RBAC has four built-in roles and three of them (reader, writer, admin) are namespaced. When you use Azure CLI to manage to assign one of those roles, the rolebinding and cluster rolebinding record stored in etcd will be updated accordingly.

RBAC mechansim	Use case
Azure RBAC for Kubernetes	Manage RBAC programmatically using Azure CLI, or infrastructure as code
Kubernetes RBAC	Manage RBAC declaratively with more granularity for all types of Kubernetes resources including CRD

For ease of operation it is advised to use Kubernetes RBAC whenever possible. Azure RBAC is still used for RBAC at the level of Azure resource but not at the level of Kubernetes resource.

In the the second access type, AKS cluster may use managed identity or service principal. Azure’s recommendation is managed identity over service principal. Managed Identity is a wrapper around Service Principal with less overhead. Managed Identity can be system assigned (created at the time of cluster creation), or user assigned (can be created ahead of time by Azure administrator and imported to the cluster’s context).

The second access type can be further broken down because there are several components in AKS that uses their own identities. I list the related managed identities as below:

Name	Purpose	BYO identity with Terraform
cluster identity	This identity represents the cluster	Specify in identity block in kubernetes_cluster resource
agent pool identity	This identity represents kubelet running in the agent pool	Specify in kubelet_identity block.
addon: azurepolicy	This identity represents azure policy addon to access the policy	N/A
addon: omsagent	This identity represents OMS agent to access monitoring etc	Specify in oms_agent_identity block
addon: secret	This identity represents to the secret addon, to access AKV	Specify in secret_identity block
addon: ingress gateway	This identity represents the ingress application gateway	ingress_application_gateway_identity block

By default, the system creates a new managed identity for each of the required identity above. For simplicity with identity management, we may create a managed identity and use it for all the occasions where an identity is needed and user assigned (BYO) identity is supported.

In the “az aks show” command return (a JSON document), the identity section (root level) reports the cluster identity, the identityProfile section (root level) reports the agent pool (kubelet) identity. Other identities such as omsagent, are reported in their own child document.

Node Networking

In Azure, a subnet can span across multiple availability zones. Therefore an AKS cluster can put its nodes on a single subnet with nodes evenly distributed across three AZs for high availability. The AZ of each node is indicated in the node label, and can be displayed with kubectl command.

Within a single AZ, a good practice to minimize latency between nodes is to place the nodes in a proximity placement group (PPG). However, only a single PPG can be associated with a node group. You can’t have three PPGs, one in each AZ, for a single subnet.

Pod Networking

The default Pod networking model is kubenet, which involves overlay network. Pod-to-Pod traffic across nodes requires Network Address Translation (NAT). To overcome this performance tax, Azure introduces Azure CNI which gives each Pod an routable IP address from the VNet’s CIDR. This requires advanced IP planning to prevent IP exhaustion. A risk introduced in Azure CNI is that all Pods are exposed on the V-net, which needs to be protected by Network Security Group and/or outbound firewall.

DNS

On the DNS side, when AKS cluster integrate with an external node network, it may create weird issues that are hard to troubleshoot. Another example is with DNS. If the V-Net uses an external DNS server (which is common for enterprises with hybrid network to use an on-premise DNS server), then the cluster creation failed with time-out with misleading error messages (for example, this comment). This is because the DNS name of the newly created cluster is not resolvable within the V-NET, which points to the on-prem DNS server. The fix to that is:

Use a BYO DNS zone (in Azure) for AKS cluster creation;
The AKS cluster will publish the A-record to the zone. To allow this to happen, the AKS cluster’s managed identity needs to have DNS contributor permission for the zone;
Configure the on-prem DNS for conditional forwarding to the DNS zone

This fix will allow AKS to resolve its name and therefore confirm its own creation. Here is a good blog about the DNS zone options.

Another potential issue introduced with the use of on-prem DNS server, is the resolution of single-label hostname of the nodes. This is not just an issue in the context of AKS. It is a generic issue with VMs running on a V-Net pointing to on-prem DNS, as explained in detail here.

In this situation, we should use the fully qualified hostname instead of single-label hostname. The fully qualified hostname with DNS suffix can help the on-prem server to configure conditional forwarding. For example, when the DNS suffix is *.internal.cloudapp.net, then forward it to Azure’s virtual internal DNS server 168.63.129.16 which can resolve the hostname.

If only the Pods need to resolve those FQDNs, then we can configure Core-DNS with conditional forwarding, which will take effect only at the cluster level without the need for changing the on-prem DNS. The Core-DNS configuration looks like this:

apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
 name: coredns-custom # this is the name of the configmap you can overwrite with your changes
 namespace: kube-system
data:
 cloudapp.override: | # you may select any name here, but it must end with the .override file extension
 log
 rewrite continue {
 name regex ^(.*[0-9]{7}-vmss[0-9]{6})$ {1}.internal.cloudapp.net
 answer name ^(.*)\.internal\.cloudapp\.net$ {1}
 }
 forward internal.cloudapp.net 168.63.129.16
 cloudapp.server: |
 internal.cloudapp.net:53 {
 errors
 log
 cache 10
 forward . 168.63.129.16
 }

Alternatively, use Pod DNS policy so that the Pod can use an external DNS server.

Initial Service Account

When a cluster is created, an Azure AD user or group can be assigned as cluster administrator. For a CI/CD pipeline to interact with the newly created cluster, a service account in Kubernetes is needed. Suppose we use Terraform to create the AKS cluster, we can create such service account automatically with the Kubernetes provider. This requires that the Terraform execution environment to have network access to the cluster. If the AKS cluster is located in a private network, then the agent where Terraform CLI runs should also be on the network. Alternatively, use Terraform Enterprise hosted in an environment with access to the cluster’s network.

Integration with Azure KeyVault

Azure Key Vault can store several types of secrets, key value pair, X509 keys and certificate. When AKV is integrated with an AKS cluster, the Kubernetes workload can access the secrets as mounted volumes, using CRD named SecretProviderClass. Further, they can be presented as Kubernetes Secret, using a Pod to sync between mounted content and Secret. AKV has three types of entries: key, certificate and secret (key-value). The certificate entry requires both key and certificate are stored, with optional certificate chain. In my opinion this is an over design. Unless we need Azure to manage the certificate (e.g. rotation) I would simply use secret to store my own X509 key and certificate.

AKS Lessons Learned 1 of 2

Sat, 04 Dec 2021 02:11:06 -0400

In general, troubleshooting Kubernetes is tricky. That is because one has to get in and out of pods. I took two days to troubleshoot some networking issues with private AKS cluster. For the amount of of tricks I had to employ, I need to take some notes.

The issue

After writing the Terraform code, I used the following dummy service to test the private AKS cluster:

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
 name: aks-helloworld-one
spec:
 replicas: 1
 selector:
 matchLabels:
 app: aks-helloworld-one
 template:
 metadata:
 labels:
 app: aks-helloworld-one
 spec:
 containers:
 - name: aks-helloworld-one
 image: neilpeterson/aks-helloworld:v1
 ports:
 - containerPort: 80
 env:
 - name: TITLE
 value: "Welcome to Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)"
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
 name: aks-helloworld-one
spec:
 type: LoadBalancer
 ports:
 - port: 80
 selector:
 app: aks-helloworld-one

The expected behaviour, is that the service object will tell cloud API to provision a load balancer, with public IP listing at port 80. I should be able to curl to the IP address and connect to the site in the Pod. However, I was not able to. On the bastion host, I was able to curl to nodePort of the node address. But anything on public IP does not work, no matter where I ran curl from. This feels like a basic issue, but is is quite annoying because the native troubleshooting tool for Azure Load Balancer is horrible. In and out of a bunch of components named “insights”, “diagnostic log”, or “Metrics”, I can’t simply find a way to trace whether it received an HTTP request. Most of the information I was able to see was irrelevant or useless.

The approach

The hard way to troubleshooting infrastructure as code, is configuration comparison approach: revert to a baseline configuration, and see if the expected function works. Then from the baseline, change one configuration at a time and see where it starts to break. This approach is very time consuming, and AKS cluster as a relatively large resource, with numerous attributes, takes this effort to extreme.

The baseline configuration I started with is:

az aks create -g AutomationTest -n orthCluster --generate-ssh-keys --node-count 1 --tags Owner=MyOwner

With this baseline, I simply use kubectl to apply the YAML file above. Then I can tell that the port is working. With a good start point, I started to apply one change at a time and repeat the test. I ran into a snug when I’m using the following configuration:

az aks create -g AutomationTest -n orthCluster --generate-ssh-keys --node-count 1 --tags Owner=MyOwner --enable-private-cluster --network-plugin azure --network-policy calico

With the cluster created from the command above, the variable introduced is –enable-private-cluster. This puts the cluster on a private network. I cannot connect to the cluster via a public endpoint anymore, and thus have to figure out some tricks to run the kubectl commands. I had to play with the Command Run feature of AKS cluster because I don’t have a bastion host when using AZ CLI command. The Command Run feature would not allow me to use any file from bastion host. So i had to create my test objects, the Deploy and the Service objects all by imperative commands. The equivalent commands I worked out is:

kubectl create deployment aks-helloworld-one --image=neilpeterson/aks-helloworld:v1 --replicas=1 --port=80
kubectl expose deploy aks-helloworld-one --port 80 --target-port 80 --type='LoadBalancer'

Then I realized a limitation with Command Run feature: it only supports basic command switches and doesn’t like switches such as –replicas. So I used the following commands:

az aks command invoke -g AutomationTest -n orthCluster -c "kubectl get no"
az aks command invoke -g AutomationTest -n orthCluster -c "kubectl create deployment aks-helloworld-one --image=neilpeterson/aks-helloworld:v1"
az aks command invoke -g AutomationTest -n orthCluster -c "kubectl get deploy"
az aks command invoke -g AutomationTest -n orthCluster -c "kubectl expose deploy aks-helloworld-one --port 80 --target-port 80 --type=LoadBalancer"
az aks command invoke -g AutomationTest -n orthCluster -c "kubectl get svc"

This trick allows me to continue with the testing eliminate Azure CNI and Calico policy as the cause. Testing after each cluster creation is painful because the cluster creation can take 10 minutes.I had to temporarily minimize the size of the cluster to speed up provisioning.

I finally came to the point that I can reproduce the issue using TF template. I realized that when I set the vnet_subnet_id attribute of azurerm_kubernetes_cluster’s default_node_pool, the problem came back. That’s the smoking gun that the node subnet is the issue.

The Network Security Group on Node Subnet

The node subnet has an associated network security group. I discovered that once I add an allow rule for port 80 to the security group, the curl test will work. I also noticed the security group rule change will take 60 sec to come to effect and load balancer will also take 60 sec to warm up.

This confuses me because port 80 is only listened by the load balancer and not by any of the nodes. It’s most likely when public load balancer is used the load balancer is placed on the node subnet. According to this note:

Inbound, external traffic flows from the load balancer to the virtual network for your AKS cluster. The virtual network has a Network Security Group (NSG) which allows all inbound traffic from the load balancer. This NSG uses a service tag of type LoadBalancer to allow traffic from the load balancer.

The packet coming from external source can travel up to the VNet, but it was blocked at the NSG of node subnet.

Lessons Learned

We always need to have some dummy service ready to test what we need. We can use nginx dummy service like:

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
 name: my-nginx
spec:
 selector:
 matchLabels:
 run: my-nginx
 replicas: 2
 template:
 metadata:
 labels:
 run: my-nginx
 spec:
 containers:
 - name: my-nginx
 image: nginx
 ports:
 - containerPort: 80
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
 name: my-nginx
 labels:
 run: my-nginx
spec:
 type: LoadBalancer
 ports:
 - port: 80
 protocol: TCP
 selector:
 run: my-nginx

As discussed above, it’s also important to have a Bastion host able to access the control plane when the AKS cluster is private. Azure touts about CloudShell (and its ability to run in specified V-Net) but it’s pretty useless in troubleshooting. CloudShell sessions run inside of Kubernetes cluster and lacks common network troubleshooting tool such as nc. Azure has a managed service for Bastion but it requires a subnet with the exact name of AzureBastionSubnet.

We will explore more issues in the next post.