active directory on Digi Hunch

Landing Zone in Azure – Introduction

Sat, 25 Mar 2023 01:30:00 -0400

I recently renewed my associate administrator certification, and feel it’s a good opportunity to brush up on Azure landing zone.

The lame part of this is the semantics. I found many similar terms across cloud service provider (CSPs). In the context of Azure, it makes sense to clarify the terms again for Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF) and Cloud Operating Models.

Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF)

Similar to AWS Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF), Azure also has the concept of CAF and it means the same thing. This part may feel lofty, but it’s in fact foundational. To get started on the cloud there are thousand ways to configure the foundation (right or wrong). The adopter needs CAF to navigate through the offerings and define what they can achieve.

The CAF documentation is good although length. The most “beefy” part is Ready section.

Cloud Operating Models

Every cloud company has some narrative about cloud operating model. For example, Here’s Hashicorp’s definition, and here’s AWS‘ white paper on it. In the context of Azure, the CAF document gives some guidance on developing your own operating model in alignment with the CAF. In addition, it also gives a few example cloud operating models:

Decentralized operations
Centralized operations
Enterprise operations
Distributed operations

There is a comparison table that highlights their differences as well as an accountability chart proposing team divisions. Another insightful table is the one that list out implementation starting point and typical path of iterations for each operating model. The table also suggests that Azure Landing Zone includes two implementation options: starting small and CAF enterprise-scale.

Landing Zone at High Level

Followed by Cloud Operating Model is the design and implementation of Azure Landing Zone. There are currently eight design areas:

Billing and Active Directory tenant: including Azure AD tenant
Identity and Access Management: including hybrid identity
Network Topology and Connectivity
Resource Organization: different levels of resource containers
Security
Management
Governance
Platform automation and DevOps

Out of the many design areas, I fell short off IAM and Network so I’ll try to discuss them in more details below in the next section. As for resource organization, apart from Resource Group and Subscription, it is also important to understand management group.

Most cloud engineers work with subscription and resource group. That is where a lot are going on. For enterprises however, Azure has to address the requirement for the capability of top-down enforcement. Management Group provides a governance scope above subscriptions, provided that all subscriptions trust a single Azure AD account. Management groups may form a hierarchy of up to six levels to help you configure policies and access, so that the all the subscriptions under each management group have unified policy and access configuration. At the very top is root management group. Any assignment of user access or policy on the root management group applies to all resources within the directory. Because of this, all customers should evaluate the need to have items defined on this scope.

We can apply policy guardrails (e.g Azure Policy) at management group level so that the policies are effect across subscriptions. Azure Policy can also address operational compliance considerations by monitoring configuration drift.

Identity and Access Management

First, we really need to distinguish AD DS on Windows Server, Azure AD and Azure AD DS. In an old post, I discussed what is a Windows domain, the key role of a domain controller (to manage user identity, as well computer identity), and the fact that Active Directory is a complete redesign of Windows Domain system since Windows 2000. So we can start with AD DS on Windows Server:

AD DS on Windows Server: In the good old days, some common network administrative activities were to configure Active Directory (including the X.500 compatible database, the OUs, domains and forests) on Windows Servers, joining computers to the company’s domain, configure group policy, configure LDAP and Kerberos, upgrading Domain controllers, etc. Over the years, Microsoft moved these activities to the cloud and offer them as a managed service, known as Azure AD DS.
Azure Active Directory Domain Service (Azure AD DS): allows you to use managed domain services (e.g. Windows Domain Join, group policy, LDAP, Kerberos authentication) without having to deploy, manage or patch domain controllers. It is a SaaS offering to manage your domain controllers in the cloud, with a pay-as-you-go model. The counterpart in AWS is “AWS Directory Service” which lets you run Microsoft Active Directory (AD) as an AWS managed service.

In summary, both AD DS on Windows Server (self-hosted) and Azure AD DS (managed service) are identity stores that operates on Windows domains. Even though the latter is a managed service, it supports LDAP or Kerberos as integration protocol for third party applications (usually on-premis) to use. Both LDAP and Kerberos came around prior to the cloud era and they are not optimized for cloud connectivity. For example, insecure bind (on port 389) in LDAP is still prevalent. Kerberos is fairly complex to configure. However, they are not phased out right away because of their established presence as well as the domain’s awareness to authenticate devices.

Many organizations have to keep their domain service and when they move to cloud so they still have to use Active Directory as identity store. For this, Azure has Azure AD connect. On the AWS side, there is also an AD connector tool to allow on-prem users to log into AWS applications and services. With AD connector you can also join EC2 instance to existing AD domain.

Now let’s examine Azure AD.

Azure AD: is an IAM solution. It contains an identity store (with users and groups in a flat directory structure) but more importantly it integrates with external identity stores (including Domain Service, self-hosted or SaaS managed), which gives it hybrid-identity capability. A company can even sync their own on-prem identity store to Azure AD using Azure AD Connect. As an IAM solution, Azure AD also allows a company to tie their identity store to applications using modern protocols such as SAML and OAuth. Azure AD treats applications as objects, and they can represents either Microsoft Applications (Office 365, Dynamics 365, Azure) or third-party ones (Slack, Salesforce) as long as they use the supported protocol for SSO. The closest AWS counterpart of Azure AD is Amazon Cognito (arguably), even though their capabilities are not identical in every aspect.

Compared to Domain Service, Azure AD alone doesn’t have the concept of domain. Therefore you cannot join a server or PC to a domain and configure group policy. Azure AD’s native identity store is a flat directory structure without OUs or forests. Azure AD is NOT a replacement of domain service, either self-hosted or managed.

Now coming back to the Azure landing zone literature, the document lays out the key decision to make about identity:

A critical design decision for enterprise organizations adopting Azure is whether to extend current on-premises identity domains into Azure or to create new identity domains.
Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) and hybrid identity

The document even includes a comprehensive identity decision guide. After this decision, we’ll know what identity store to use. Then we can address the problem of platform access vs workload access. In other words, IAM of management traffic vs business traffic, which opens up topics such as RBAC, service principle and managed identities.

Networking

Back in 2017, Azure published a white paper about V-Net and it focuses on mesh network and hub-and-spoke. Back then Azure customers run multiple lines of business (LOB) on different V-Nets. The V-Net peering feature allows early cloud adopters to organize all their V-Nets in a mesh topology, ensuring all peers have access to all other peers, or a hub-and-spoke topology to aggregate shared resources in hubs so they can be shared by the spokes in the network.

When setting up a landing zone, network topology is a big decision. In the landing zone document today, clients need to consider the followings:

Traditional Azure networking topologies, including:
- large flat V-Net
- multiple V-Nets connected with multiple Azure ExpressRoute circuits/connections
- hub-and-spoke
- full mesh
- hybrid
Microsoft managed networking topology (on top of Virtual WAN)

From the 2017 white paper, most organizations at that time solve their need for network isolation and connectivity by creating a mesh architecture among various V-Nets. All nodes in the network are interconnected so network traffic is fast and can be easily redirected. However, mesh topology has significant disadvantages because it requires too many connections as the footprint expands, making it very costly to operate and quick to reach limit of number of peering links. It is not scalable. The white paper is to advocate the use of hub-and-spoke topology, which I will discuss in the next section.

It is worth-noting that, today (Jan 2023) one can create both topologies with Azure Virtual Network Manager. It is currently a preview service but I can foresee it will eventually get integrated with landing zone.

No matter which topology, another issue to address is connectivity to on-prem network, and to Azure PaaS services. If the traffic is light, we can use VPN gateway to configure IPSec tunnel that goes over public internet encrypted. It is simple to configure with a good aggregate bandwidth. This connection requires a VPN device on premise as well. A faster alternative is Azure ExpressRoute, which runs a private connection with a third-party connectivity provider. ExpressRoute is more complex and expensive to set up, but it supports much higher bandwidth with direct access and better SLA. In reality, many clients configures ExpressRoute with VPN failover for connectivity to on-prem network. For connectivity to PaaS services, options are service endpoint and private link endpoint.

Hub-and-spoke topology

In the traditional topologies, hub-and-spoke network topology is popular as the hub network provides a central point of management. Also it overcomes subscription limits and institutes a separation of concerns. The Azure documentation recommends hub-and-spoke architecture for larger cloud adoption efforts. If the footprint is even massive, we can even extend the model to a cluster of hubs and spokes.

A cluster of multiple hub-and-spoke

We can connect multiple hubs using:

V-Net peering
Azure ExpressRoute
Azure Virtual WAN
Site-to-site VPN

Within a single hub-and-spoke model, the Hub V-Net hosts shared services and acts as central point of connectivity (to many spoke V-Nets). Often in the Hub V-Net are Azure Bastion, Azure Firewall and VPN Gateway or ExpressRoute gateway. The spoke V-Nets (in same or different subscriptions) isolates and manage workloads in prod, non-prod, etc. Since a single V-Net cannot traverse subscription boundaries, you have to use V-Net peering (preferred), ExpressRoute circuit, or VPN Gateways. V-Net peering works across regions, and across Azure AD tenants. It is low-latency but isn’t transitive.

In some cases we also configure perimeter networks (aka DMZs) in the hub-and-spoke architecture, to handle external traffic. Perimeter networks host services such as External Load balancer, Azure Firewall, Azure Application Firewall on Azure Application Gateway or on Azure FrontDoor) , network virtual appliances (NVAs), IDS, IPS, and other security appliances. Incoming packets flow through the security appliances before reaching back-end servers. Internet-bound packets from workloads must also flow through security appliances in the perimeter network before they can leave the network. The document gives an example of a DMZ hub V-Net with two perimeter networks.

Virtual WANs

This page discusses what is WAN and SD-WAN. WAN connects multiple LANs in different geographic areas and is common with companies with multiple offices in different regions. WAN infrastructure may be privately owned or leased as a service from a third-party service provider (hybrid WAN). Companies may use IPSec VPN, SSL VPN or direct connection to build their WANs. Software-defined WAN (SD-WAN) leverages virtualization technologies, network overlays, on-site SD-WAN devices and software platforms to build hybrid WANs.

Azure Virtual WAN (similar to AWS cloud WAN) is a managed service to build a virtual WAN with a single operational interface that brings many networking, security and routing functionalities together. It simplifies end-to-end network connectivity (within Azure, between Azure and on-prem) by creating a hub-and-spoke architecture.

Virtual WAN

Virtual WAN is essentially an integrated connectivity solutions (in hub and spoke), with a global transit network architecture. The configurations, including spoke setup) is automated and troubleshooting is more intuitive. Global transit network configures multiple virtual WAN hubs with hub-to-hub connectivity, which ultimately enables any-to-any connectivity, with different paths discussed here.

The landing zone document recommends Virtual WAN for new large or global network deployments in Azure where you need global transit connectivity across Azure regions and on-premises locations.

Summary

Landing Zone configuration involves many components and there is no way to discuss everything thoroughly. In this post I put down my notes reading Azure landing zone documentation. Overall, working on landing zones requires learning a variety of services by the CSP.

Azure Deets

Mon, 25 Oct 2021 23:13:52 -0400

Both Azure and AWS are leading players in public cloud. AWS developed a lot of SMB customer in technology. Azure attracted many enterprises from their on-prem customers. In addition to clienteles, their models to manage resources in the cloud are also different in several aspects. While this post is by no means a comprehensive comparison, it serves as a refresher on how Azure is different from AWS in cloud engineering.

Subscription and Resource Group

Both subscription and resource group are means to manage resources in group. Subscription is associated with a credit card and groups resource financially. Resource group groups resources logically. A subscription can have multiple resource groups, as illustrated here in the hierarchy map.

Azure CLI

There are two CLI tools: Azure PowerShell for PowerShell users, and Azure CLI for Linux users. The distinction is not clear, because PowerShell can also run on multiple platforms such as MacOS and Linux. On the other hand, Linux Bash can run on Windows (e.g. using WSL2). The different lies more in the command nomenclature. For example, to list subscriptions, the PowerShell Cmdlets reads:

Get-AzSubscription

The Azure CLI comes much cleaner:

az account list

The command and argument naming in Azure CLI align with Linux commands. I prefer Azure CLI for its succinctness. When looking up VM skus, we can use this command:

az vm list-skus -l eastus2

The return is a JSON document. In advanced use cases, we can filter the result by using jq utility. Alternatively, we can filter the result and groom the output with jmespath query, just like AWS CLI. For example, in eastus2 region, we look for instances that:

Has virtualMachines as resource Type
Has AcceleratedNetworking enabled
Has EncryptionAtHostSupported enabled
Has PremiumIO enabled

For each of the result, we print out:

number of vCPUs
Memory size

For this use case we will have to provide a JMESPath query as below, then output the result as a table:

az vm list-skus -l eastus2 --query "[?resourceType=='virtualMachines' && capabilities[?name=='AcceleratedNetworkingEnabled' && value=='True'] && capabilities[?name=='EncryptionAtHostSupported' && value=='True'] && capabilities[?name=='PremiumIO' && value=='True']].{Name:name,vCPUs:capabilities[?name=='vCPUs'].value|[0],MemoryGB:capabilities[?name=='MemoryGB'].value|[0]}" --output table

The result looks like this:

I use variations of the command above very often to find out the best instance for AKS nodes.

Infrastructure as Code

The native infrastructure as code option is ARM (Azure Resource Manager) template in JSON format. It is extremely wordy and perhaps why Azure later developed Bicep as the second generation of IaC tool. Terraform has a provider for Azure as well. For comparison among ARM, Terraform and Bicep, I have written a blog post for Slalom build covering more details.

Networking

Here is a great post comparing Azure Network with AWS.

At a high level, Azure Virtual Network (or VNet) is the equivalent of VPC in Amazon. Likewise, peering can be configured between VNets. As to subnet, Azure is different because there is no conceptual distinction between public subnet and private subnet. In AWS, public subnet is subnet attached with an Internet Gateway via a network route. So “private” or “public” are in terms of outbound traffic. On the other side, Azure does not distinguish between private or public subnet. Resources connected to a VNet have access out to the Internet by default. As to inbound traffic, you can make a VM available on Internet by giving it a public IP (same as AWS). You can make it available to other VNet, by configuring a service endpoint. Customers typically need custom routes to redirect outbound traffic (e.g. through firewall). In VPC, subnets are mapped to availability zones one-to-one, whereas in Azure, a subnet may traverse multiple availability zones.

With Azure, it is also important to understand difference between Azure service endpoint and Azure private endpoint:

Azure service endpoint: provides connectivity to Azure services over n optimized route over the Azure backbone network. Traffic will leave your VNet.
Azure private endpoint: a NIC that uses private IP from your VNet. This NIC connects you privately and securely to a service powered by Azure Private Link. By enabling a private endpoint, you’re bringing the service into your VNet.

On security group, we can associated a network security group with a network interface, or with a subnet. In contrast, in AWS, a security group can only be associated with an instance’s network interface.

Azure Bastion and Jump Box

There is a managed service called Azure Bastion. It is a SSH/RDP proxy fully managed as PaaS. However, its use case is virtual machines. It cannot be used to access other services. For example, if you create a private AKS cluster, then you need a command terminal to access the API server. This is not what Azure Bastion can do. Instead, you either need a virtual machine in the AKS network as jump box.

The alternative is an Azure Cloud Shell, which will require storage but can be configured to be placed inside of a V-Net. However, Azure Cloud Shell is not running inside of a full-fledged Linux operating system. You cannot install commands.

To create a bastion host, e.g. without public IP address, use the following CLI command:

az vm create -n MyBastion -g AutomationTest --image UbuntuLTS --subnet suitable-porpoise-node-subnet --vnet-name suitable-porpoise-vnet --ssh-key-values ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub --authentication-type ssh

If the bastion host is needed with a public Ip, configure the network security group accordingly. The AZ CLI command above will create a VM, with an OS user named after the command line terminal user.

IAM

Azure AD is a managed identity service. Here is the difference between Active Directory and Azure AD.

Azure RBAC is a mechanism for authorization. Just like IAM policies, Azure RBAC enforces permissions using role assignment, which consists of:

security principal ( user, group, service principal, or managed idenity)
role definition: defines what actions is allowed and what is not allowed
scope: the object of the action

To enforce RBAC, one needs to create role assignment objects, each specifying principal, role, and scope.

Service Principle and Managed Identity

The two concepts may appear confusing. I find this article a great reference to demystify them. The takeaway is: service principle is the equivalent of service account in old Active Directory. Managed identity is a service principle automatically managed by a resource. Managed identity can be user assigned or system assigned.

Managed Identity is a “wrapper” around a service principal. It is automatically created and automatically rotated.

Azure DevOps

I think of Azure DevOps (ADO) of a managed pipeline implementation, with a repository (just like BitBucket), a board to manage tickets (similar to JIRA), Wiki (just like Confluence), Artifactory. The Pipelines is the part that’s similar to Jenkins. ADO calls a build pipeline a Pipeline, and a release/deployment pipeline a Release. A pipeline and a release are fundamentally the same but they are used in different ways. A pipeline’s input is usually the code repository, and the output is artifact. A release’s input is usually an artifact, and it connects to infrastructure in different environments.

ADO has its own ecosystem for plugins, managed under Visual Studio marketplace. Many extensions are open-source. If you are not happy with an extension, you can publish your own extension to market place.

Logging and Monitoring

Azure Monitor manages metrics, logs and alerts. To further analyze logs, create a log analytics workspaces, where you can run Kusto queries. You can create a workbook and embed Kusto queries into visual objects on the workbook.

Storage

Azure manages storage resources under storage account. The resource classes include Blob (object), File, Queue, Table and Disk (block). They have a few acronyms on redundancy levels.

Redundancy Option	Data Copy	Access level
LRS – Locally redundant	synchronously copy your data three times within the AZ in the primary region.	Write is acknowledged after three synchronous writes.
ZRS – Zone-redundant	synchronously copy your data across three AZs in the primary region. your data is still accessible for both read and write even if one AZ becomes unavailable.	Write is acknowledged after three synchronous writes. If an AZ becomes unavailable, Azure undertakes networking updates (e.g. DNS re-pointing). Application may perceive a blip where re-try policies may help.
GRS – Geo-redundant	LRS in primary region + asynchronously copy your data to a single AZ in the secondary region + LRS in secondary region	your data in the secondary region isn’t available for read or write access unless there is a failover to the secondary region. for read access to the secondary region, configure your storage account to use RA-GRS (read-access geo-redundant storage) If the primary region becomes unavailable, you can choose to fail over to the secondary region. After the failover has completed, the secondary region becomes the primary region, and you can again read and write data.
GZRS – Geo-zone-redundant	ZRS in primary region + asynchronously copy your data to a single AZ in the secondary region + LRS in secondary region	your data in the secondary region isn’t available for read or write access unless there is a failover to the secondary region. for read access to the secondary region, configure your storage account to use RA-GZRS (read-access geo-zone-redundant storage) If the primary region becomes unavailable, you can choose to fail over to the secondary region. After the failover has completed, the secondary region becomes the primary region, and you can again read and write data.

The disaster recovery and failover happens at storage account level.

Introduction to Active Directory (AD)

Fri, 28 Feb 2020 21:36:00 -0400

Workgroup, homegroup and Windows Domain

A workgroup is a group of computers on the same local network. A Windows computer not joined to a domain is part of a workgroup. In a workgroup, no computer has control over any other computer and it does not require a password. Any computer can join or leave a workgroup any time. Workgroup was previously for home file and printer sharing and Microsoft later introduced homegroup for more security. Compared to workgroup, all computers in a homegroup needs to be on the same home network (instead of local network). Homegroup is password protected. New computer needs to join homegroup by providing the password.

Windows domains (or domains for short) provide network administrators with a way to manage a large number of PCs and control them from one place and remotely. One or more servers — known as domain controllers — have control over the domain and the computers on it. Computers on a domain has to be on the same local network, either physically or over VPN. Centralized control is essential for corporate operation.

Administrators can join a Windows PC with professional or enterprise license to a domain. Once joined, the computer does not use its own local user accounts. When a user logs into a computer on that domain, the computer authenticates the user account name and password with the domain controller. Also, the computer cannot just leave the domain without administrator access.

Network administrators can change group policy settings on the domain controller. Each computer on the domain will get these settings from the domain controller and they’ll override any local settings users specify on their PCs. All the settings are controlled from a single place. This prevents from users from changing many system settings on a computer joined to a domain. The domain controller is in charge of what a user can do.

Apart from centralized administration, the benefit the users is that they can log in with the same username and password on any computer joined to the domain, if permission allows.

Domain Controller

In order to achieve centralized administration and log-in from any computer in the corporate world, a centralized service called domain controller is introduced. At a high level, a domain controller maintains a list for each of the followings:

Users and their passwords
Computers and their credentials

This is because in a domain, not only the users, but also the computers (workstations or servers) need to be authenticated. For example, when a Windows server boots up, it needs to log on to the domain with its own credential. This way we can control whether the server is allowed to query the domain for information about users. If it is allowed to query the domain, then we can determine whether the user is allowed to log on that server, and eventually, authenticate the user.

For a domain controller, it responsibility to credentials for users and computers, and respond to log in requests (authentication service) is a critical commitment in the enterprise environment. Domain controller is therefore commonly built with high availability and fault tolerance.

Administrators needs to add each new user to the user directory in domain controller. They also needs to register each new computer with the domain controller by joining them to the domain.

Joining a Domain

As explained earlier, joining a Window domain means register a computer in the domain so it has the permission to query the domain to validate users identity and permissions. Both Windows server and Linux server can join a domain. Windows servers usually provide a path through UI to join a domain and password is required.

To join a Linux (e.g. Redhat) server to a domain, we can use a tool called adcli. Here is a good example of using this command to join a domain.

Authentication

A Windows or Linux server in the domain needs to go to the domain controller to authenticate itself and the users. Authentication involves several protocols, including kerberos, NTLM, TLS/SSL and Digest, as part of an extensible architecture. In addition, some protocols are combined into authentication packages such as Negotiate and the Credential Security Support Provider.

The MIT Kerberos Documentation provides some tools (e.g. kinit, klist) to configure and troubleshoot Kerberos protocol.

Active Directory

Since Windows 2000, Active Directory is a complete redesign and re-branding of the entire Windows Domain system. The term Active Directory now refer to either the entire domain system, or the actual database that comprises the Windows Domain information or both.

All of the information that makes up an Active Directory is stored in an X.500 compatible database, typically replicated between domain controllers to ensure high availability and fault tolerance. X.500 is a set of network directory standards. A Windows Domain is a kind of network directory, hence the name Active Directory for its replacement.

Active Directory introduced one important new type of object and concept, Forests. An Active Directory Forest is kind of a list of lists, meaning, it is a collection of Domains that are all related to each other for both security and management purposes.

Here is more details about Active Directory.

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol

As mentioned above, X.500 is a series of computer networking standards covering electronic directory services. ISO incorporated it into OSI suite of protocols. The protocols defined by X.500 include DAP (Directory Access Protocol), DSP (Directory System Protocol), DISP (Directory Information Shadowing Protocol) and DOP (Directory Operational Bindings Management Protocol). DAP is a heavyweight protocol that operates over a full OSI protocol stack and requires a significant amount of computing resources. LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol), as its alternative, is designed to operate over TCP/IP and provides most of the functionality of DAP at a much lower cost.

Technically speaking, LDAP is a directory access protocol to an X.500 directory service. In early days, the typical architecture involves a proxy. Client connects to the proxy in LDAP and the proxy connects to X.500 server in DAP. Nowadays, it is common that LDAP is directly implemented in X.500 servers.

Because LDAP is based on a simpler subset of the standards contained within the X.500 standard, LDAP was sometimes called X.500-lite. While DAP and the other X.500 protocols can now use the TCP/IP networking stack, LDAP remains a popular directory access protocol.